Dissecting Cardiovascular Responses to a Fixed-Interval Volitional Sighing Protocol Using a Mixed Modeling Approach.
Neel Muzumdar, Kelly Sun, Samuel Zhang, Kelsey Piersol, Anthony P Pawlak, Marsha E Bates, Jennifer F Buckman
Psychophysiology January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1111/psyp.70235 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractVolitional sighing at fixed intervals produces a sympathetic cardiovascular response similar to exercise, with heart rate, low-frequency heart rate variability, pulse transit time variability, mean arterial pressure, and low-frequency blood pressure variability all increasing significantly from baseline. Greater changes occurred during shorter intervals between sighs (one every 15 seconds versus one every 30 seconds). High-frequency heart rate variability decreased only during the more frequent sighing task. Males showed larger increases than females in heart rate and several sympathetic indices, but smaller decreases in high-frequency heart rate variability. The fixed-interval volitional sighing protocol may serve as a stress test to detect early cardiovascular or autonomic dysfunction.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 250 |
| Population | Healthy college students |
| Intervention | fixed-interval volitional sighing (FIVS) protocol |
| Topics | Breathwork |
| Keywords | Blood pressure Heart rate variability Pulse Respiration |
| Key finding | Volitional sighing at fixed intervals elicits cardiac, vascular, and autonomic responses consistent with sympathetic activation, with greater responses at higher sighing frequencies and detectable sex differences. |
Abstract
Sighing generates a reliable sympathetic cardiovascular response that, like exercise, could be leveraged in a graded "stress test" to reveal preclinical changes in cardiovascular health and stress reactivity. This study presents the fixed-interval volitional sighing (FIVS) protocol, which rhythmically paces sighs at different frequencies to systematically load the cardiovascular system. Cardiovascular and autonomic responses during the FIVS protocol were statistically dissected to independently characterize physiological responses. Sex differences were explored as a preliminary step toward characterizing factors that affect sigh reactivity. Healthy college students (n = 250, 65% female) completed a baseline task and two sighing tasks: a longer inter-sigh interval task (1 sigh per 30 s, long interval), followed by a shorter inter-sigh interval task (1 sigh per 15 s, short interval). Heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and respiration were continuously measured. Mixed models with a priori cardiorespiratory assumptions isolated HR, low-frequency heart rate variability (LF-HRV), high-frequency HRV (HF-HRV), pulse transit time variability (PTTv), mean arterial pressure (MAP), low-frequency blood pressure variability (LF-BPV), and high-frequency BPV (HF-BPV) responses to the sighing tasks. HR, LF-HRV, PTTv, MAP, and LF-BPV increased significantly from baseline to both sighing tasks, with greater changes observed during short-interval sighing. HF-BPV increased similarly from baseline to both sighing tasks. HF-HRV decreased only during the short-interval sighing task. Males exhibited greater increases than females in HR, LF-HRV, LF-BPV, HF-BPV, and PTTv but smaller decreases in HF-HRV in response to sighing. Volitional sighing elicits cardiac, vascular, and autonomic responses consistent with sympathetic activation. As time under load and loading intensity increased, greater responses were observed in several vascular and sympathetic indices. Sex differences suggest that the FIVS protocol can detect person-specific differences in cardiovascular responding. Sighing is physically accessible for most people, and the FIVS protocol may be useful as a stress test to detect early-stage cardiovascular or autonomic dysfunction.