Skip to content

How do psychedelics impact people with a history of non-affective psychosis? A qualitative study.

Haley Maria Dourron, Heith Copes, Daniel H. Grossman, Melissa Bradley, Christopher R. Nicholas, Jessica A. Turner, Gaige Allen-Clark, Maggie Gossage, Peter S. Hendricks

Front Psychiatry December 9, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1716545 via PubMed Central

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

People diagnosed with non-affective psychotic disorders who used psychedelics reported a mix of positive and negative effects. Common challenges during the acute experience included transient anxiety, sometimes leading to brief hospitalizations. Some participants described psychosis-specific experiences such as reduced self-stigma and insight into their hallucinations and delusions. Perceived long-term benefits varied widely, with some reporting lasting positive changes and others noting negative effects or no lasting impact. The findings suggest psychedelics may pose both risks and potential benefits for this population, highlighting the need for careful safety trials.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Qualitative study Peer reviewed
Sample size 19
Population People with non-affective psychotic disorders who had used psychedelics after diagnosis
Citations 3
Key finding Psychedelic use in people with non-affective psychotic disorders is associated with both risks, such as transient anxiety and hospitalization, and potential benefits, including reduced self-stigma and insight into symptoms, but the durability of benefits varies widely.

Abstract

Background: People with a history of psychotic disorders are excluded from contemporary trials of psychedelic-assisted therapy. Although survey studies have explored the impact of naturalistic psychedelic use on people with a history of psychotic disorders, a qualitative study has yet to examine the subjective effects of psychedelic use in this population during both the acute effects and perceived long-term impacts. Method: Two semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with participants (n = 19) who had used psychedelics after the diagnosis of non-affective psychotic disorders (NAPD). Interviews probed the perceived positive and negative effects of psychedelic use. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: We constructed three major themes: 1) common challenges during the acute effects of psychedelics; 2) psychosis-specific psychedelic experiences; and 3) post-acute and long-term effects. In the common challenges of psychedelic use theme, participants often described experiences with transient anxiety, which sometimes resulted in brief self-reported hospitalizations. In the psychosis-specific psychedelic experiences theme, the subthemes consisted of psychedelics during and after psychosis, self-compassion and reduced self-stigma, and insight into hallucinations and delusions. The post-acute and long-term effects theme included subthemes of positive effects, negative effects, and a lack of long-term effects. Overall, most participants described some benefits of psychedelics, but the durability of perceived benefits varied widely. Conclusion: Psychedelics might have heterogeneous impacts on people with NAPD, including both risks for harm and potential benefits. Our findings may assist in the development of safety and tolerability trials, highlighting the need for more nuanced work that examines how psychedelics impact people with NAPD.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment