Skip to content

The Quantitation of 2-Oxo-3-hydroxy Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (O-H-LSD)in Human Urine Specimens, a Metabolite of LSD: Comparative Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography-Selected Ion Monitoring Mass Spectrometry and Liquid Chromatography-Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry

Gregory K. Poch, K. L. Klette, Carolyn J. Anderson

Journal of Analytical Toxicology April 1, 2000 DOI: 10.1093/jat/24.3.170 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Two liquid chromatography methods (mass spectrometry and ion trap mass spectrometry) are compared for detecting 2-oxo-3-hydroxy lysergic acid diethylamide (O-H-LSD), a major LSD metabolite in urine. Both procedures show linear calibration from 0 to 8,000 pg/mL with correlation coefficients above 0.99, and limits of detection and quantitation of 400 pg/mL. Reanalysis of 68 human urine specimens previously positive for LSD found O-H-LSD concentrations averaging about 16 times higher than LSD concentrations. Either method can be adapted for high-volume drug testing, and targeting this metabolite may extend the detection window for LSD use.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Method comparison study Peer reviewed
Sample size 68
Population Human urine specimens previously found to contain LSD
Topics LSD
Keywords Metabolite Urine Selected ion monitoring Quantitative analysis chemistry
Citations 33
Key finding O-H-LSD concentrations in urine were approximately 16 times higher than LSD concentrations, and both LC methods performed similarly for detection and quantitation.

Abstract

This paper compares the potential forensic application of two sensitive and rapid procedures (liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and liquid chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry) for the detection and quantitation of 2-oxo-3-hydroxy lysergic acid diethylamide (O-H-LSD) a major LSD metabolite. O-H-LSD calibration curves for both procedures were linear over the concentration range 0-8,000 pg/mL with correlation coefficients (r2) greater than 0.99. The observed limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) for O-H-LSD in both procedures was 400 pg/mL. Sixty-eight human urine specimens that had previously been found to contain LSD by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry were reanalyzed by both procedures for LSD and O-H-LSD. These specimens contained a mean concentration of O-H-LSD approximately 16 times higher than the LSD concentration. Because both LC methods produce similar results, either procedure can be readily adapted to O-H-LSD analysis for use in high-volume drug-testing laboratories. In addition, the possibility of significantly increasing the LSD detection time window by targeting this major LSD metabolite for analysis may influence other drug-free workplace programs to test for LSD.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment