Skip to content

LSD: A missed opportunity?

Gordon Claridge

Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental September 1, 1994 DOI: 10.1002/hup.470090504 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

LSD was once considered a potential chemical key to understanding schizophrenia but was rejected as a drug model for human psychosis, while the amphetamine model gained preference. The rejection was influenced not only by scientific factors but also by psychiatry's and society's growing disaffection with existentialist interpretations of schizophrenia, which LSD was associated with as a recreational drug. The proscription of LSD and a shift toward an organic view of schizophrenia made the simpler amphetamine (dopamine) model more acceptable. Flaws in the dopamine model and challenges from a more psychobiological approach suggest a need for a more elaborated neurochemical account, including central serotonergic influences, which could restore LSD's utility in schizophrenia research.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics LSD
Keywords Schizophrenia object-oriented programming Psychology Psychotomimetic Hallucinogen
Citations 11
Key finding LSD was rejected as a drug model for schizophrenia due to both scientific and sociocultural factors, but its data could still inform a more elaborated neurochemical account of the disorder.

Abstract

Abstract Despite its early promise as ‘the chemical key to schizophrenia’, and its manifest properties as a psychotomimetic, LSD failed to catch on as a drug model for human psychosis. The reasons for this and the longstanding preference, instead, for the amphetamine model are examined. It is argued that the rejection of LSD was not just a scientific decision, but was influenced by increasing disaffection in psychiatry and society at large with psychological (existentialist) interpretations of schizophrenia with which LSD, as a recreational drug, was associated. The proscription of LSD and the shift towards a strongly organic view of schizophrenia created a climate where it was easier to accept the simpler amphetamine (dopamine) model. Flaws in the latter, its further recent undermining as an exclusive theory, and challenges to an overly organic psychiatry by a more psychobiological approach, are all discussed in the light of the perceived need for a more elaborated neurochemical account of schizophrenia; this includes a rǒle for central serotonergic influences in the disorder, removing much of the previous objection to LSD as a drug model. Several ways are suggested in which data about LSD could still usefully be drawn upon in schizophrenia research; including, in animal experimentation, its direct use to test the viability of the various biological models of schizophrenia on offer. Some examples of the latter are given, including a study of LSD from the author's own past work.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment