Ayahuasca–From Dangerous Drug to National Heritage: An Interview with Antonio A. Arantes
Beatriz Caiuby Labate, Ilana Seltzer Goldstein, Campinas State Univesity
International Journal of Transpersonal Studies January 1, 2009 DOI: 10.24972/ijts.2009.28.1.53 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractBrazilian ayahuasca religious groups sought recognition as part of the nation's immaterial cultural heritage in 2008. Anthropology professor Antonio A. Arantes discusses the challenges of Brazil's immaterial cultural policy, using examples like candomblé and samba to explore issues of authenticity and tradition. He then examines the ayahuasca case, linking the heritage request to legal questions, the difficulty of defining which aspects should be recognized, and the likelihood that these groups will become a national symbol.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Interview Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Ayahuasca |
| Keywords | Psychology Traditional medicine |
| Citations | 15 |
| Key finding | The interview explores the challenges and implications of recognizing ayahuasca religious groups as part of Brazil's immaterial cultural heritage, including issues of authenticity, tradition, and legal definitions. |
Abstract
This interview with Antonio A. Arantes, Brazilian anthropology professor and recognized specialist on the topics of intellectual property and traditional knowledge, addresses the 2008 request by Brazilian ayahuasca groups to be recognized as part of the immaterial cultural heritage of Brazil. In the first portion of the interview, Arantes reflects on the challenges of the new conceptions of the Brazilian national immaterial policy program. He discusses several examples of cultural goods recognized by the Brazilian state, such as the candomblé and the samba, and analyzes the controversial issues involving authenticity and tradition in these and other similar cases. In the second portion, Arantes reflects on the specific case of ayahuasca, the relationship of this cultural heritage request to legal issues, the challenges to define exactly what aspects should be recognized, and speculates on the chances that these religious groups will come to be recognized as a national symbol of Brazil.