Skip to content

Direct Screening of Urine for MDMA and MDA by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry*

Helena K. Nordgren, Olof Beck

Journal of Analytical Toxicology January 1, 2003 DOI: 10.1093/jat/27.1.15 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) with atmospheric pressure chemical ionization detected MDMA and MDA in urine with a 100 ng/mL cutoff and 10% coefficient of variation. In 1000 clinical patient urine samples, the LC-MS-MS method identified nearly four times as many MDMA-positive samples as the immunochemical method, with no false positives and one false negative. The findings suggest LC-MS-MS is a viable alternative to immunochemical screening for drugs of abuse.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Method comparison study Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,000
Population Clinical patient urine samples
Keywords Chemistry Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry Urine Tandem mass spectrometry
Citations 43
Key finding LC-MS-MS detected almost four times as many MDMA-positive urine samples as the immunochemical method, with no false positives and one false negative.

Abstract

There is a limit in the number of substances detected by commercially available reagents. It is therefore important to have other, complementary techniques. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) may offer one possibility. An LC-MS-MS procedure based on the detection of positive ions after atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) was developed for direct measurement of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine in urine. It was compared with Online Amphetamines. The LC-MS-MS methodology showed improved sensitivity (1 00-ng/mL cutoff and specificity with a coefficient of variation of 10%. It was compared to the immunochemical analysis using 1000 clinical patient urine samples. The positive samples were confirmed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The LC-MS-MS method detected almost four times as many samples positive for MDMA compared to the immunochemical method, with no false positives and one false negative. Our study suggests that LC-MS-MS offers an alternative to immunochemical methods in drug of abuse screening.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment