The mechanisms involved in the long‐lasting neuroprotective effect of fluoxetine against MDMA (‘ecstasy’)‐induced degeneration of 5‐HT nerve endings in rat brain
Violeta Sánchez Sánchez, Jorge Camarero, B. Moreno Esteban, Markus Peter, A R Green, M. Isabel Colado
British Journal of Pharmacology September 1, 2001 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704230 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractFluoxetine provides long-lasting protection against MDMA-induced damage to serotonin nerve endings in rat brain, while fluvoxamine only protects when given at the same time. MDMA caused loss of serotonin and its metabolite in cortex, hippocampus, and striatum, and reduced paroxetine binding one week later. Fluoxetine given with MDMA or up to four days before offered complete protection, and significant protection when given seven days before. Fluvoxamine required concurrent administration. Fluoxetine's protection appears due to its and its active metabolite's inhibition of the serotonin transporter, not by altering MDMA accumulation or metabolism.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Experimental study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Rats |
| Interventions | Fluoxetine Fluvoxamine MDMA |
| Dose | MDMA 15 mg/kg i.p.; Fluoxetine 10 mg/kg i.p. ×2, 60 min apart; Fluvoxamine 15 mg/kg i.p. ×2, 60 min apart |
| Duration | 7 days post-MDMA |
| Topics | MDMA Serotonin |
| Keywords | Fluoxetine Paroxetine Fluvoxamine Pharmacology |
| Citations | 103 |
| Key finding | Fluoxetine, but not fluvoxamine, provides long-lasting protection against MDMA-induced neurodegeneration by inhibiting the serotonin transporter without altering MDMA accumulation or metabolism. |
Abstract
It has been reported that co‐administration of fluoxetine with 3,4‐methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ‘ecstasy’) prevents MDMA‐induced degeneration of 5‐HT nerve endings in rat brain. The mechanisms involved have now been investigated. MDMA (15 mg kg −1 , i.p.) administration produced a neurotoxic loss of 5‐HT and 5‐hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5‐HIAA) in cortex, hippocampus and striatum and a reduction in cortical [ 3 H]‐paroxetine binding 7 days later. Fluoxetine (10 mg kg −1 , i.p., ×2, 60 min apart) administered concurrently with MDMA or given 2 and 4 days earlier provided complete protection, and significant protection when given 7 days earlier. Fluvoxamine (15 mg kg −1 , i.p., ×2, 60 min apart) only produced neuroprotection when administered concurrently. Fluoxetine (10 mg kg −1 , ×2) markedly increased the K D and reduced the B max of cortical [ 3 H]‐paroxetine binding 2 and 4 days later. The B max was still decreased 7 days later, but the K D was unchanged. [ 3 H]‐Paroxetine binding characteristics were unchanged 24 h after fluvoxamine (15 mg kg −1 , ×2). A significant cerebral concentration of fluoxetine plus norfluoxetine was detected over the 7 days following fluoxetine administration. The fluvoxamine concentration had decreased markedly by 24 h. Pretreatment with fluoxetine (10 mg kg −1 , ×2) failed to alter cerebral MDMA accumulation compared to saline pretreated controls. Neither fluoxetine or fluvoxamine altered MDMA‐induced acute hyperthermia. These data demonstrate that fluoxetine produces long‐lasting protection against MDMA‐induced neurodegeneration, an effect apparently related to the presence of the drug and its active metabolite inhibiting the 5‐HT transporter. Fluoxetine does not alter the metabolism of MDMA or its rate of cerebral accumulation. British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 134 , 46–57; doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704230