Neuroimaging in moderate MDMA use: A systematic review
Felix Mueller, Claudia Lenz, Markus Steiner, Patrick C. Dolder, Marc Walter, Undine E. Lang, Matthias E. Liechti, Stefan Borgwardt
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews December 30, 2015 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.010 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractModerate use of MDMA (ecstasy) shows no convincing evidence of structural or functional brain alterations in neuroimaging studies. A review of 19 studies, each involving subjects with fewer than 50 lifetime episodes or under 100 tablets consumed, found no significant harmful effects. However, the lack of results is linked to high methodological variability in dosages and co-consumption of other drugs, low study quality, and small sample sizes.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Humans with moderate MDMA use (average <50 lifetime episodes or <100 tablets) |
| Topics | MDMA |
| Keywords | Neuroimaging Recreational use Clinical psychology |
| Citations | 68 |
| Key finding | Moderate MDMA use is not convincingly associated with structural or functional brain alterations in neuroimaging measures. |
Abstract
MDMA ("ecstasy") is widely used as a recreational drug, although there has been some debate about its neurotoxic effects in humans. However, most studies have investigated subjects with heavy use patterns, and the effects of transient MDMA use are unclear. In this review, we therefore focus on subjects with moderate use patterns, in order to assess the evidence for harmful effects. We searched for studies applying neuroimaging techniques in man. Studies were included if they provided at least one group with an average of <50 lifetime episodes of ecstasy use or an average lifetime consumption of <100 ecstasy tablets. All studies published before July 2015 were included. Of the 250 studies identified in the database search, 19 were included. There is no convincing evidence that moderate MDMA use is associated with structural or functional brain alterations in neuroimaging measures. The lack of significant results was associated with high methodological heterogeneity in terms of dosages and co-consumption of other drugs, low quality of studies and small sample sizes.