The Detection of Novel Stimulants in Oral Fluid from Users Reporting Ecstasy, Molly and MDMA Ingestion
Alex J. Krotulski, Amanda L A Mohr, Melissa F. Fogarty, Barry K. Logan
Journal of Analytical Toxicology July 16, 2018 DOI: 10.1093/jat/bky051 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAmong people attending electronic dance music festivals, self-reported use of Ecstasy, Molly, or MDMA often does not match what is actually in their system. Over four years, oral fluid from 223 participants who said they had recently used one or more of those terms was tested. Only 54.3% had MDMA alone; 29.6% tested positive for a novel stimulant instead. Most participants (91%) used only one term, with Molly the most common (60.6%), followed by MDMA (27.1%) and Ecstasy (12.3%). The findings indicate that the terms Ecstasy, Molly, and MDMA are not used interchangeably or accurately, and that users may unknowingly consume novel psychoactive substances.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 223 |
| Population | Participants attending large multi-day electronic dance music festivals in Miami, FL; Tampa, FL; and Atlanta, GA |
| Topics | MDMA |
| Keywords | Ingestion Hallucinogen Designer drug |
| Citations | 50 |
| Key finding | Of 223 participants reporting Ecstasy, Molly, and/or MDMA/MDA use, only 54.3% tested positive for MDMA alone, while 29.6% tested positive for at least one novel stimulant. |
Abstract
"Ecstasy" and "Molly" are common drug slang terms used among club and rave cultures to denote preparations believed to contain 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA). However, users of Ecstasy and Molly have increasingly tested positive for novel psychoactive substances (NPS), notably novel stimulants. To evaluate hypothesized non-specific and interchangeable use of the terms Ecstasy, Molly and MDMA, self-reported drug use was compared against toxicological findings in biological specimens. Oral fluid specimens were collected from participants attending large multi-day electronic dance music festivals in Miami, FL; Tampa, FL; and Atlanta, GA. Participants additionally completed a structured survey about recent recreational drug use. Collected specimens were screened for therapeutic drugs, common drugs of abuse and NPS using liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF). Positive screen results were confirmed by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS-MS) methods for MDMA, MDA, methylone, dimethylone, ethylone, butylone, dibutylone, eutylone, pentylone, N-ethyl pentylone (ephylone), alpha-PVP and 4-fluoroamphetamine (4-FA). During this 4-year study, 223 participants provided an oral fluid specimen and indicated recent use of Ecstasy, Molly and/or MDMA/MDA. Of these subjects, 203 (91.0%) indicated only one of these drug terms; while 20 (9.0%) participants indicated a combination of multiple terms. Of the 203 participants designating only one drug term, 123 (60.6%) reported Molly use, 55 (27.1%) reported MDMA use and 25 (12.3%) reported Ecstasy use. Seven participants reported the use of MDA, but these responses were paired with MDMA responses due to detection of MDA as a metabolite of MDMA. The results from this study indicate that there are inconsistencies between admission to drug use and toxicological findings in this population. Of the 223 participants who indicated use of Ecstasy, Molly and/or MDMA/MDA, MDMA without a novel stimulant was confirmed in 121 (54.3%) participants, while 66 (29.6%) tested positive for at least one novel stimulant.