Selection and Optimization of Hydrolysis Conditions for the Quantification of Urinary Metabolites of MDMA
Stéphane Pirnay, T. T. Abraham, Richie H. Lowe, Marilyn A. Huestis
Journal of Analytical Toxicology October 1, 2006 DOI: 10.1093/jat/30.8.563 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAcid hydrolysis recovers more MDMA urinary metabolites than enzymatic hydrolysis with beta-glucuronidase from either E. coli or Helix pomatia. Acid hydrolysis yielded 40.0% and 39.3% higher HMA recovery compared to E. coli and H. pomatia hydrolysis, respectively. E. coli beta-glucuronidase gave 17.1% and 26.5% greater MDA recovery than acid hydrolysis and H. pomatia hydrolysis. HMMA recovery by acid hydrolysis was 336.1% and 159.8% greater than E. coli and H. pomatia beta-glucuronidase. Optimal conditions were 100 µL hydrochloric acid per 1 mL urine incubated at 120°C for 40 minutes. Based on recovery, time, availability, and cost, acid hydrolysis is preferred.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Comparative study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Urine samples |
| Intervention | acid hydrolysis |
| Dose | 100 microL of hydrochloric acid per 1 mL urine |
| Keywords | Chemistry Helix pomatia Chromatography Metabolite Enzymatic hydrolysis |
| Citations | 23 |
| Key finding | Acid hydrolysis recovers more HMMA, HMA, and MDA conjugates from urine than enzymatic hydrolysis with beta-glucuronidase from E. coli or Helix pomatia. |
Abstract
Recovery of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) urinary metabolites requires optimization of the hydrolysis of 4-hydroxy-3-methyoxymethamphetamine (HMMA), 4-hydroxy-3-methoxyamphetamine (HMA), and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) conjugates prior to chromatographic analysis. Acidic and enzymatic hydrolysis with beta-glucuronidase from Escherichia coli and Helix pomatia were evaluated. Acid hydrolysis yielded 40.0% and 39.3% higher HMA recovery compared to E. coli and H. pomatia hydrolysis, respectively (SE=9.8 and 11.4%). E. coli beta-glucuronidase hydrolysis MDA recovery was 17.1% and 26.5% greater than acid hydrolysis and H. pomatia beta-glucuronidase recovery (SE=3.3 and 6.1%), respectively. HMMA recovery by acid hydrolysis was 336.1% and 159.8% greater than E. coli and H. pomatia beta-glucuronidase (SE=72.8 and 31.6%), respectively. The effects of temperature, time, and acid amount on metabolite recovery were also evaluated. HMA and HMMA acid hydrolysis recoveries were improved at 100 degrees C and above. Effective hydrolysis could be conducted in a dry block heater, GC oven, or autoclave at temperatures from 100 to 140 degrees C. Optimal hydrolysis conditions for the measurement of MDMA metabolite conjugates were addition of 100 microL of hydrochloric acid to 1 mL urine and incubation at 120 degrees C in a GC oven for 40 min. Therefore, based on HMMA, HMA, and MDA recoveries, time efficiency, availability of instrumentation, and cost, acid hydrolysis was preferred to enzyme hydrolysis.