Schizophrenia: A New Approach. II. Result of a Year's Research
A. Hoffer, H Osmond, John Smythies
Journal of Mental Science January 1, 1954 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.100.418.29 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA hypothesis that a substance with properties between mescaline and adrenaline, called M substance, might be an aetiological agent in schizophrenia was proposed a year earlier. The current paper reports on a year of collaborative testing of that hypothesis. The hypothesis suggested that such a substance, with mescaline-like psychological effects but adrenaline-like concentrations, could account for schizophrenia better than existing theories.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Duration | One year |
| Topics | Mescaline |
| Keywords | Schizophrenia object-oriented programming Psychology Test biology Psychiatry |
| Citations | 300 |
| Key finding | The authors report on a year of testing the hypothesis that a hypothetical M substance, with properties between mescaline and adrenaline, is an aetiological agent in schizophrenia. |
Abstract
About one year ago, with the encouragement of the Editor-in-Chief, a short paper appeared in this Journal entitled “Schizophrenia; A New Approach” (18). In this paper it was noted that mescaline and adrenaline have a similar biochemical structure. It was suggested that one of the aetiological agents in schizophrenia might be a substance or substances lying between these two; with the psychological properties of mescaline but effective in concentrations nearer those of adrenaline. Dr. Harley Mason elaborated this suggestion from the biochemical standpoint. For convenience these hypothetical substances were called, collectively, M substance. If M substance occurred in the body, it would account for the group of illnesses usually referred to as schizophrenia better than any hypothesis so far advanced. It has been the good fortune of the co-authors of that first paper (J. R. S. and H. O.) to be able to join forces with the third author of this paper (A. H.) to test the hypothsis. It is with the efforts of the last year that this paper is concerned.