Skip to content

The Potential Influence of Associated Antidepressants on the Pharmacokinetic Profile of Esketamine in Patients Affected by Treatment-resistant Depression.

Marika Alborghetti, Luana Lionetto, Ginevra Lombardozzi, Luca Montaguti, Giada Trovini, Daniela Donato, Giuseppe Costanzi, Donatella De Bernardini, Federica Catapano, Michele Surano, Ilaria Pagano, Alessia Ceccherelli, Edoardo Bianchini, Giorgio Di Lorenzo, Maurizio Simmaco, Giovanni Martinotti, Georgios D Kotzalidis, Ferdinando Nicoletti, Sergio De Filippis

Current neuropharmacology April 7, 2025 DOI: 10.2174/011570159X356952241216172603 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

In patients with treatment-resistant depression receiving intranasal esketamine (56 mg) alongside another antidepressant, those taking antidepressants that inhibit cytochrome-P450 isoforms (paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine, venlafaxine) had significantly higher serum esketamine levels 20 minutes after dosing and over 72 hours compared to patients on sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, or vortioxetine. Salivary esketamine levels were several-fold higher than serum levels at all time points and showed high variability. These pharmacokinetic differences did not affect clinical outcomes, but changes in systolic blood pressure positively correlated with serum esketamine levels, suggesting dose reduction may be warranted for patients with cardiovascular comorbidity on those CYP450-inhibiting antidepressants. Small subgroup sizes limit strong conclusions.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 53
Population Patients with treatment-resistant depression receiving intranasal esketamine
Interventions Esketamine Paroxetine Fluoxetine Duloxetine Venlafaxine Sertraline Citalopram Escitalopram Vortioxetine
Dose 56 mg
Topics Depression Esketamine
Keywords Antidepressant drugs Cytochrome p450 isoenzymes. Treatment-resistant Esketamine/ketamine/spravato
Citations 1
Key finding Antidepressants that inhibit CYP450 isoforms (paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine, venlafaxine) significantly increase serum esketamine levels, which correlate with systolic blood pressure changes but not clinical outcomes.

Abstract

Esketamine is administered intranasally in combination with at least another antidepressant in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Some of these antidepressants might affect ketamine's pharmacokinetic profile by inhibiting cytochrome-P450 (CYP450) isoforms. Our aim was to establish how different types of combined antidepressants affect serum and salivary levels of esketamine at the time of maximum plasma concentrations and afterward in TRD patients receiving esketamine in a real-world context. Serum and salivary samples were collected from 53 patients receiving intranasal esketamine (56 mg) at baseline, after 20 min (roughly corresponding to Tmax), 7 hours (corresponding to the t½ value), 24, and 72 hours. Patients were stratified according to the combined antidepressant medication. Salivary esketamine levels were several-fold higher than the corresponding serum levels at all time points, and showed high inter-individual variability. Serum 20-min post-esketamine levels and AUC0-72 levels were significantly higher in patients on antidepressants known to inhibit different isoforms of CYP450 (paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine, venlafaxine), with respect to levels detected in patients on sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, vortioxetine. These changes in the pharmacokinetic profile of esketamine did not affect the clinical outcome of esketamine. However, changes in systolic blood pressure in response to esketamine positively correlated with serum esketamine levels, suggesting a reduction of esketamine dose in patients with cardiovascular comorbidity under treatment with paroxetine, fluoxetine, duloxetine, venlafaxine. The CYP450-related status of co-administered antidepressants may affect esketamine levels. However, the small sample sizes of the co-administered drug subgroups and multiple prescriptions do not allow for drawing strong conclusions.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment