The collective lie in ketamine therapy: a call to realign clinical practice with neurobiology
Charles Miller, Bárbara Lopes, Anna Mccurdy
Frontiers in Psychiatry September 22, 2025 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1610335 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractKetamine therapy is often wrongly linked to psychedelic culture, but its therapeutic effect comes from blocking NMDA receptors to promote neuroplasticity, not from the acute dissociative experience. The dissociative state emphasized in ketamine-assisted psychotherapy is neither necessary nor sufficient for lasting improvement; meaningful recovery depends on plasticity-driven brain reorganization in the days after administration. Prioritizing subjective experience during dissociation risks distorting memory and reinforcing maladaptive narratives, undermining the potential of psychoplastogenic treatments. The article calls for evidence-based protocols aligned with neurophysiology, advocating for greater education, standardization, and scientific rigor in clinical practice.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Narrative review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | Ketamine-assisted psychotherapy |
| Topics | Ketamine |
| Keywords | Clinical practice Dissociative Narrative review Mental health |
| Key finding | The acute dissociative experience in ketamine-assisted psychotherapy is neither necessary nor sufficient for therapeutic success; lasting improvement requires plasticity-driven reorganization in the days following administration. |
Abstract
In recent years, ketamine therapy has become increasingly entangled with psychedelic culture, leading to widespread misinterpretation of its therapeutic mechanism. This manuscript challenges the prevailing narrative that positions ketamine as a consciousness-expanding agent or psychotherapy enhancer, highlighting the discord between this view and ketamine's well-established neurobiological function as an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist that promotes neuroplasticity. Drawing on recent research and clinical data, the article argues that the acute dissociative experience often emphasized in ketamine-assisted psychotherapy (KAP) is neither necessary nor sufficient for therapeutic success. Instead, it describes how meaningful, lasting improvement in mental health outcomes requires plasticity-driven reorganization in the days following ketamine administration, not from insights gleaned during dissociation. By prioritizing subjective experience over biological timing, current KAP practitioners risk distorting memory, reinforcing maladaptive narratives, and undermining the potential of psychoplastogenic treatments. This article calls for a shift toward evidence-based protocols that align clinical practice with neurophysiology, advocating for greater education, standardization, and scientific rigor in ketamine therapy.