Esketamine Implementation Challenges in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Analysis of Mental Healthcare Providers’ Social Media Commentary
Annals of Clinical Psychiatry March 10, 2026 DOI: 10.1177/10401237261434394 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractMental healthcare providers discussing esketamine (Spravato) online between 2019 and 2022 most frequently cited billing and reimbursement problems (65.1% of posts), billing codes (48.9%), staffing (18.3%), and pharmacy or drug procurement issues (16.7%) as implementation challenges. Sentiment about reimbursement was mostly negative (72.3%), and most posts comparing esketamine to ketamine favored using ketamine (86.7%). The findings suggest that under-reimbursement, billing difficulties, and logistical barriers may be hindering the adoption of esketamine for treatment-resistant depression.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Qualitative study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 186 |
| Population | Online posts and comments from mental healthcare providers |
| Key finding | Billing and reimbursement challenges were the most discussed implementation barrier among mental healthcare providers using or considering esketamine. |
Abstract
Background Though esketamine was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment-resistant depression in 2019, there is no published research on implementation challenges. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate online commentary about these challenges among mental healthcare providers. Methods Using the terms “esketamine” and “Spravato”, the author searched social media groups dedicated to mental healthcare providers on December 15, 2022. Posts and associated comments about using or implementing esketamine into practices were included in the dataset and thematically coded. Prevalence of themes about implementation challenges, illustrative quotes, and sentiment analyses are reported. Results 186 relevant posts and comments from March 12, 2019 to November 27, 2022 were identified. The most discussed challenges were billing/reimbursement (65.1%), billing codes (48.9%), staffing (18.3%), pharmacy/drug procurement (16.7%), space (11.8%), time (10.2%), “Buy and bill” acquisition (9.1%), and the FDA Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program (7%). Sentiment regarding reimbursement for esketamine was mostly negative [72.3% (34/47 posts)], as was sentiment towards esketamine’s manufacturer (62.5% (5/8 posts). Most posts [86.7% (13/15 posts)] comparing esketamine to ketamine favored using ketamine. Conclusions These data suggest that under-reimbursement, billing challenges, and logistical barriers may be hamstringing implementation of esketamine into psychiatric practices.