Prevalence of new psychoactive substances and prescription drugs in the Belgian driving under the influence of drugs population
Sarah M.r. Wille, Camille Richeval, M. Nachon‐phanithavong, Jean‐michel Gaulier, Vincent Di Fazio, Luc Humbert, Nele Samyn, Delphine Allorge
Drug Testing and Analysis June 22, 2017 DOI: 10.1002/dta.2232 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractAmong drivers stopped in Belgium in 2015, 7% of blood samples and 11% of oral fluid samples contained new psychoactive substances (NPS), including diphenidine, ketamine, mephedrone, and synthetic cannabinoids. Additionally, 17% of blood samples contained an analgesic drug, 10% a benzodiazepine or hypnotic, and smaller proportions antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, or methylphenidate. Poly-drug use combining NPS with licit drugs and drugs of abuse was common. The findings demonstrate that NPS are present in the predominantly young male driving-under-the-influence population and highlight the need for on-site detection methods and further research on combined drug effects on driving ability.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cross-sectional study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 757 |
| Population | Drivers stopped during roadside controls in Belgium (January to August 2015) who had a positive Drugwipe 5S test (blood samples) or negative test pads (oral fluid samples) |
| Duration | January to August 2015 |
| Keywords | Pharmacology Psychoactive drug Population Mephedrone Benzodiazepine |
| Citations | 68 |
| Key finding | New psychoactive substances were detected in 7% of blood samples and 11% of oral fluid samples from drivers, with high rates of poly-drug use involving NPS, prescription drugs, and drugs of abuse. |
Abstract
Driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) is a worldwide problem. Several countries have adopted DUID legislations which prove their deterrent effect and impact on road safety. However, the use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) and prescription drugs is not known, as the applied roadside screening tests have not yet been adapted for these compounds. In this study, 558 blood samples obtained during roadside controls in Belgium (January to August 2015) after a positive Drugwipe 5S® test and 199 oral fluid (OF) samples obtained from negatively screened test pads were analyzed. The NPS positivity rate was 7% in blood, while it reached 11% in OF. NPS detected were: diphenidine, ketamine, 4-fluoroamphetamine, 2-amino-indane, methoxetamine, α-PVP, methiopropamine, a mix of 5-MAPB/5-EAPB, TH-PVP, mephedrone, methedrone, 4-methylethylcathinone, 5-MeO-DALT, 4-Acetoxy-DiPT, AB Fubinaca, FUB-JWH018, JWH020, trifluoromethylphenylpiperazine, and ethylphenidate. Moreover, 17% of blood samples (and 5% of OF) contained an analgesic drug, 10% (0.5%) a benzodiazepine/hypnotic, 5% (2%) an antidepressant, 2% (3%) an antipsychotic, 2% an antiepileptic drug, and 1% methylphenidate. The presence of NPS in the young (and predominately male) DUID population is proven. Furthermore, a high level of poly-drug use including combinations of NPS, licit, and drugs of abuse was observed. Further research concerning the development of on-site NPS detection techniques should be established. Meanwhile, the effects of combined drug use on driving ability and the physical/psychological signs after NPS use should be performed to improve the on-site DUID detection of NPS by police officers, so they can engage in blood sampling for a general unknown screening.