Integration in Psychedelic-Assisted Treatments: Recurring Themes in Current Providers’ Definitions, Challenges, and Concerns
Mitch Earleywine, Fiona Low, Carmen Lau, Joseph De Leo
Journal of Humanistic Psychology April 2, 2022 DOI: 10.1177/00221678221085800 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractIntegration therapy, a key part of psychedelic-assisted treatment, helps people make sense of their psychedelic experiences after the drug's effects wear off. In interviews with 30 integration therapists, 19 themes emerged reliably. Therapists commonly defined integration as a bridge between the psychedelic experience and daily life, expressed concern about nonresponsive clients, and worried about the commercialization of psychedelic psychotherapy. They viewed integration as a process that starts before substance use, never ends, makes sense of the experience, creates behavioral change, is personalized, and makes the individual whole. Many also discussed client resistance, unrealistic expectations, power differentials, the need for connections to other providers, and self-care. The findings may help standardize integration therapy and inform future research.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with a mixed-methods approach Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 30 |
| Population | Integration therapists |
| Citations | 47 |
| Key finding | Integration therapists define integration as a bridge between the psychedelic experience and daily life and express concerns about nonresponsive clients and the commercialization of psychedelic psychotherapy. |
Abstract
Integration therapy, an integral part of psychedelic-assisted treatment, usually includes sessions devoted to making meaning of relevant psychedelic experiences after subjective effects have subsided. As the psychedelic renaissance continues, offers for this integration therapy have proliferated. In the present project, semi-structured interviews with 30 integration therapists focused on definitions of integration as well as challenges and concerns that they associated with the practice. A mixed-methods approach revealed 19 themes that coders identified reliably. Prevalent themes included expressing concern about nonresponsive clients, defining integration as a bridge between the psychedelic experience and daily life, and apprehensions about the commercialization of psychedelic psychotherapy. Interviewees viewed integration as a process that begins prior to the administration of substances, never ends, makes sense of the psychoactive experience, creates behavioral change, is personalized, and makes the individual whole. Most participants also discussed issues related to client resistance, unrealistic expectations of psychedelic psychotherapy, problems associated with power differentials, the importance of an integration therapist’s connection to other service providers, and the need for self-care. These data might help the standardization of integration therapy, inform lay impressions of the process, and help generate hypotheses for continued research on this aspect of psychedelic-assisted treatment. These data also suggest that psychedelic integration practitioners would appreciate regular support from a community of like-minded colleagues.