The Varieties of Self-Transcendent Experience
David Bryce Yaden, Jonathan Haidt, Ralph W. Hood, David R. Vago, Andrew B. Newberg
Review of General Psychology May 1, 2017 DOI: 10.1037/gpr0000102 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractSelf-loss is often linked to mental illness, but this review proposes that temporary states of reduced self-focus and heightened connectedness—called self-transcendent experiences (STEs)—may also promote mental health. The authors identify common psychological constructs with a self-transcendent aspect, such as mindfulness, flow, peak experiences, mystical-type experiences, and positive emotions like love and awe. Drawing on literature from social psychology, clinical psychology, and affective neuroscience, they propose psychological and neurobiological mechanisms that might underlie STEs' effects. The review concludes with suggestions for future empirical research to further explore these experiences.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Integrative review and proposed organizational framework Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 682 |
| Key finding | Self-transcendent experiences, characterized by decreased self-salience and increased connectedness, may contribute to mental health, and their effects may be mediated by specific psychological and neurobiological mechanisms. |
Abstract
Various forms of self-loss have been described as aspects of mental illness (e.g., depersonalization disorder), but might self-loss also be related to mental health? In this integrative review and proposed organizational framework, we focus on self-transcendent experiences (STEs)—transient mental states marked by decreased self-salience and increased feelings of connectedness. We first identify common psychological constructs that contain a self-transcendent aspect, including mindfulness, flow, peak experiences, mystical-type experiences, and certain positive emotions (e.g., love, awe). We then propose psychological and neurobiological mechanisms that may mediate the effects of STEs based on a review of the extant literature from social psychology, clinical psychology, and affective neuroscience. We conclude with future directions for further empirical research on these experiences.