Dreaming: a conceptual framework for philosophy of mind and empirical research
Choice Reviews Online January 20, 2016 DOI: 10.5860/choice.193885 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDreaming is conscious experience during sleep, yet its relevance to theories of consciousness and the self is often neglected due to conceptual confusion about what dreaming is. Jennifer Windt develops a conceptual framework that clarifies whether dreams are perceptions, hallucinations, imaginations, thoughts, beliefs, or self-conscious states. She argues that such a framework must be conceptually sound, phenomenologically plausible, and informed by neuroscience. Integrating historical and contemporary philosophy with empirical sleep research, Windt builds a new theoretical understanding of dreaming that enriches discussions of consciousness and the self and raises new research questions.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 121 |
| Key finding | A conceptual framework for dreaming, grounded in philosophy and neuroscience, can enrich theories of consciousness and the self. |
Abstract
Dreams, conceived as conscious experience or phenomenal states during sleep, offer an important contrast condition for theories of consciousness and the self. Yet, although there is a wealth of empirical research on sleep and dreaming, its potential contribution to consciousness research and philosophy of mind is largely overlooked. This might be due, in part, to a lack of conceptual clarity and an underlying disagreement about the nature of the phenomenon of dreaming itself. In Dreaming, Jennifer Windt lays the groundwork for solving this problem. She develops a conceptual framework describing not only what it means to say that dreams are conscious experiences but also how to locate dreams relative to such concepts as perception, hallucination, and imagination, as well as thinking, knowledge, belief, deception, and self-consciousness. Arguing that a conceptual framework must be not only conceptually sound but also phenomenologically plausible and carefully informed by neuroscientific research, Windt integrates her review of philosophical work on dreaming, both historical and contemporary, with a survey of the most important empirical findings. This allows her to work toward a systematic and comprehensive new theoretical understanding of dreaming informed by a critical reading of contemporary research findings. Windt's account demonstrates that a philosophical analysis of the concept of dreaming can provide an important enrichment and extension to the conceptual repertoire of discussions of consciousness and the self and raises new questions for future research.