A systematic review of the pharmacokinetics of classical serotonergic psychedelic compounds in healthy adult subjects.
Elliot Hampsey, Kirsty Martin, Michail Kalfas, Louis Benson, Sirid Wihlborg, Luke Jelen, Allan H Young, James Rucker
Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) May 29, 2026 DOI: 10.1177/02698811261453938 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA systematic review of 32 trials in healthy adults found that LSD and psilocybin show dose-proportional peak concentrations (Cmax), while DMT's oral and intravenous formulations differ in ways that may be clinically significant. LSD was the most studied psychedelic, followed by DMT and psilocybin; mescaline appeared in only two trials. Single studies examined intravenous LSD, intravenous psilocybin, inhaled 5-MEO-DMT, and intranasal 5-MEO-DMT. Variations in absorption, distribution, and elimination among the compounds may have important implications for clinical and research settings.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 32 |
| Population | Healthy adult volunteers |
| Keywords | Classical psychedelics Pharmacokinetics Systematic review |
| Key finding | LSD and psilocybin show dose-proportional Cmax values, and DMT's oral and intravenous formulations differ in pharmacokinetic profiles that may be clinically significant. |
Abstract
Despite renewed investigations into classical psychedelic compounds, their pharmacokinetic profiles remain incompletely understood. This systematic review collated data from healthy adult volunteers on the pharmacokinetic properties of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), psilocybin, dimethyltryptamine (DMT), mescaline, and 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MEO-DMT). We identified 32 eligible trials. LSD was the most studied compound, followed by DMT, split between intravenous (IV) and oral formulations. Psilocybin was also frequently studied. Mescaline was reported in two trials, with IV LSD, IV psilocybin, inhalation 5-MEO-DMT, and intranasal 5-MEO-DMT reported in single studies. Key findings include dose proportional Cmax values for LSD and psilocybin, alongside differences between oral and IV formulations of DMT that may be clinically significant. This systematic review highlights key variations in absorption, distribution, and elimination between the studied compounds that may have important implications in both clinical and research settings.