Skip to content

The Potential Economic and Public Health Impact of MDMA‐Assisted Group Therapy for PTSD in Ukraine

Elliot Marseille, Olga Chernoloz, Ю. Д. Шмидт

World Medical & Health Policy August 21, 2025 DOI: 10.1002/wmh3.70039 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Providing group MDMA-assisted therapy (MAT) with supplemental individual sessions for PTSD in Ukraine is likely cost-effective and could save lives. Modeling 1000 patients, treatment costs $1.1 million, averts 19.2 deaths, and gains 717 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over 3 years. From a healthcare payer perspective, MAT costs $1537 per QALY gained, considered cost-effective. From a societal perspective, it generates net savings of $2.6 million. Scaling to half of eligible patients over 10 years could save 48,000 lives and gain 1.5 million QALYs, with net societal savings of $5.6 billion. The findings support including MAT in Ukraine's mental health strategy.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Decision analysis model Peer reviewed
Sample size 1,000
Population PTSD patients in Ukraine
Duration 1-, 3-, and 5-year horizons; 10-year scaled-up projections
Topics MDMA
Keywords Group psychotherapy Public health Group periodic table Psychology
Citations 1
Key finding Group MDMA-assisted therapy is cost-effective from a healthcare payer perspective and cost-saving from a societal perspective for treating PTSD in Ukraine.

Abstract

ABSTRACT The war in Ukraine has led to widespread trauma, with 6.4 million people suffering from severe, chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study evaluates the cost‐effectiveness and societal impact of implementing modified group MDMA‐assisted therapy (MAT), with supplemental individual therapy for PTSD treatment in Ukraine. Using a decision analysis model, we estimated clinical benefits, costs, and cost‐effectiveness of MAT for 1000 PTSD patients in Ukraine. The model incorporates PTSD severity, mortality rates, healthcare costs, productivity effects, and caregiver costs. We analyzed outcomes from healthcare payer and societal perspectives over 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year horizons, projecting scaled‐up impacts for 25%, 50%, and 75% of eligible patients over 10 years. Assuming 3 years of MAT efficacy, treating 1000 patients would cost $1.1 million, avert 19.2 deaths and gain 717 quality‐adjusted life years (QALYs). From a healthcare payer's perspective, MAT is cost‐effective with an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio of $1537 per QALY gained and a net monetary benefit of $2843. From a partial societal perspective, MAT generates net savings of $2.6 million. Scaled to 50% of eligible patients over 10 years, MAT could save 48,000 lives and gain 1.5 million QALYs, with net societal savings of $5.6 billion. Making MAT available for PTSD treatment in Ukraine is likely to be cost‐effective or cost‐saving, while substantially improving health outcomes. These findings support consideration of MAT as part of Ukraine's strategy to address widespread mental health needs.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment