Intranasal esketamine plus oral antidepressant for treatment-resistant depression: acute induction and maintenance relapse-prevention outcomes in a systematic review and meta-analysis

For people with treatment-resistant depression, adding intranasal esketamine to an oral antidepressant produces a modest but rapid reduction in depressive symptoms within two days, with greater symptom reduction at four weeks compared to placebo nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant. The combination therapy also increases the likelihood of response and remission, and improves daily functioning. Among those who initially respond, continued esketamine treatment halves the risk of relapse. However, acute treatment increases side effects, including dissociation and elevated blood pressure, and more patients discontinue due to adverse events. These findings support the use of esketamine under medical supervision with careful individual benefit-risk assessment.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains a major clinical challenge. Intranasal esketamine, used adjunctively with an oral antidepressant, has been evaluated in randomized trials, but uncertainty persists regarding the magnitude and consistency of benefit, durability, and key harms. This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials comparing intranasal esketamine plus an oral antidepressant versus placebo nasal spray plus the same oral antidepressant in TRD. Acute induction (≈4 weeks) and maintenance randomized-withdrawal phases were analyzed separately. Depression outcomes were assessed primarily using the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and functional outcomes using the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using RoB 2.0. Random-effects models pooled mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, risk ratios (RR) for binary outcomes, and hazard ratios (HR) for relapse prevention. Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE. From 1,518 records, nine reports representing six unique RCTs (1,836 participants) were included. Four acute induction RCTs (n=937) showed greater symptom reduction at day 28 with esketamine (MADRS MD −2.99, 95% CI −5.10 to −0.89; I²=48.5%). Rapid improvement was evident by day 2 (MD −3.25, 95% CI −4.65 to −1.85). Esketamine increased day-28 response (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.20–1.74) and remission (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.20–1.92), corresponding to approximately +154 responders and +106 remitters per 1,000 patients, respectively, based on pooled control risks. Functioning improved (SDS MD −1.70, 95% CI −2.61 to −0.79). Two maintenance randomized-withdrawal RCTs (n=899) demonstrated reduced relapse risk with continued esketamine (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42–0.62; I²=0%). In acute induction, esketamine increased any treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.25–1.50) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.35–5.29), with notable increases in dissociation (RR 7.33, 95% CI 4.49–11.98) and blood pressure increased events (RR 3.96, 95% CI 2.24–7.01). Maintenance TEAE rates were similar between groups (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.99–1.17). Intranasal esketamine plus an oral antidepressant provides rapid, modest acute improvement and reduces relapse risk during maintenance among stabilized responders/remitters, but increases acute adverse events, supporting use within supervised care and individualized benefit–risk assessment.