Intranasal Esketamine Versus Other Pharmacological Strategies in Treatment-Resistant Depression with High Suicide Risk: A Six-Month Naturalistic Study.
Ana María De Granda-Beltrán, Alejandro Porras-Segovia, Daniel Núñez-arias, Alba Rodríguez-jover, Maria Paula Jassir Acosta, Philippe Courtet, Enrique Baca-García, Inmaculada Peñuelas-calvo
Clinics and practice June 12, 2026 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract16060110 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractIn a six-month naturalistic study of 62 patients with treatment-resistant depression and high suicide risk, those receiving intranasal esketamine showed faster and greater reductions in suicidal thoughts and depressive symptoms compared to those receiving alternative pharmacological treatments. The number needed to treat to prevent one case of high suicide risk was 1.35. Functional improvement was similar between groups. The findings support esketamine as a rapid-acting option in real-world, closely monitored care.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Naturalistic prospective cohort study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 62 |
| Population | Treatment-resistant depression patients with high suicide risk |
| Interventions | Intranasal esketamine alternative pharmacological interventions |
| Duration | 6-month follow-up |
| Topics | Depression Esketamine |
| Keywords | Naturalistic study Suicidal behavior |
| Key finding | Intranasal esketamine was associated with faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms compared to alternative pharmacological interventions. |
Abstract
Background: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) poses a major clinical challenge, particularly when accompanied by suicidal behavior. Intranasal esketamine has demonstrated rapid antidepressant effects in TRD, but real-world comparative evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a six-month naturalistic prospective cohort study in two Spanish mental health centers, including 62 TRD patients with high suicide risk undergoing fourth-line treatment. Thirty patients received intranasal esketamine and thirty-two alternative pharmacological interventions. Suicidal ideation (C-SSRS), depressive symptoms (HAM-D-17) and functional status (FAST) were assessed at baseline and at 1-, 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement during follow-up; however, esketamine-treated patients exhibited a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms than those receiving alternative pharmacological strategies. The number needed to treat to prevent one case of high suicide risk was 1.35. Functional improvement was comparable between groups. Conclusions: In real-world clinical settings, intranasal esketamine was associated with a faster and greater reduction in suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms among TRD patients with high suicide risk, supporting its role as a rapid-acting therapeutic option within comprehensive and closely monitored care.