Skip to content

Structural connectivity and response to ketamine therapy in major depression: A preliminary study.

Megha M Vasavada, Amber M Leaver, Randall T Espinoza, Shantanu H Joshi, Stephanie N Njau, Roger P Woods, Katherine L Narr

Journal of affective disorders January 15, 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.11.018 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

In patients with major depressive disorder, differences in brain white matter structure before ketamine treatment may predict who will respond to the drug 24 hours later. Using diffusion imaging in 10 patients, those who showed more than 50% symptom improvement had greater fractional anisotropy in the cingulum and forceps minor pathways compared to non-responders. Non-responders also had lower fractional anisotropy and higher radial and mean diffusivity in these pathways compared to healthy controls, and they had an earlier age of depression onset and longer current episode. These preliminary findings suggest that the structural integrity of emotion-related brain networks may influence ketamine's antidepressant effect.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 10
Population Patients with major depressive disorder
Intervention Ketamine
Duration 24-hour post-infusion
Keywords Biomarkers Fractional anisotropy fa Glutamate Treatment response
Citations 58
Key finding Greater fractional anisotropy in the cingulum and forceps minor before ketamine infusion was associated with clinical response 24 hours later, while non-responders showed reduced white matter integrity in these pathways compared to healthy controls.

Abstract

Ketamine elicits an acute antidepressant effect in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Here, we used diffusion imaging to explore whether regional differences in white matter microstructure prior to treatment may predict clinical response 24h following ketamine infusion in 10 MDD patients. FSL's Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) established voxel-level differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) between responders (patients showing >50% improvement in symptoms 24h post-infusion) and non-responders in major white matter pathways. Follow-up regions-of-interest (ROI) analyses examined differences in FA and radial (RD), axial (AD) and mean diffusivity (MD) between responders and non-responders and 15 age- and sex-matched controls, with groups compared pairwise. Whole brain TBSS (p<0.05, corrected) and confirmatory tract-based regions-of-interest analyses showed larger FA values in the cingulum and forceps minor in responders compared to non-responders; complementary decreases in RD occurred in the cingulum (p<0.05). Only non-responders differed from controls showing decreased FA in the forceps minor, increased RD in the cingulum and forceps minor, and increased MD in the forceps minor (p<0.05). Non-responders showed an earlier age of onset and longer current depressive episode than responders. Though these factors did not interact with diffusion metrics, results may be impacted by the limited sample size. Though findings are considered preliminary, significant differences in FA, RD and MD shown in non-responders compared to responders and controls in fronto-limbic and ventral striatal pathways suggest that the structural architecture of specific functional networks mediating emotion may predict ketamine response in MDD.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment