Nationwide consensus on the clinical management of treatment-resistant depression in Italy: a Delphi panel
Giuseppe Maina, Marina Adami, Giuseppe Ascione, Emi Bondi, Domenico de Berardis, Dario Delmonte, Silvia Maffezzoli, Giovanni Martinotti, Alessandra Nivoli, Elena Ottavianelli, The Delphi Panel Collaboration Group, Andrea Fagiolini
Annals of General Psychiatry November 26, 2023 DOI: 10.1186/s12991-023-00478-7 via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA Delphi panel of 60 Italian psychiatrists found wide variation in how treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is managed in Italy, highlighting a need for standardized strategies and treatments specifically approved for TRD. High consensus emerged on adding lithium or antipsychotics as augmentation therapies and on the need for long-term maintenance therapy. Esketamine nasal spray was identified as the best option for TRD patients, with agreement that it can be administered in a community outpatient setting given appropriate educational support for patients.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Delphi consensus study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 60 |
| Population | Italian psychiatrists with at least 5 years of experience and specific expertise in depression |
| Topics | Depression Esketamine |
| Keywords | Antidepressants Consensus statement Customized treatment |
| Citations | 56 |
| Key finding | There is wide heterogeneity in TRD management in Italy, but high consensus that esketamine nasal spray is the best option for TRD patients and that lithium or antipsychotics are important augmentation therapies. |
Abstract
Abstract Background Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is defined by the European Medicines Agency as a lack of clinically meaningful improvement after treatment, with at least two different antidepressants. Individual, familiar, and socio-economic burden of TRD is huge. Given the lack of clear guidelines, the large variability of TRD approaches across different countries and the availability of new medications to meet the need of effective and rapid acting therapeutic strategies, it is important to understand the consensus regarding the clinical characteristics and treatment pathways of patients with TRD in Italian routine clinical practice, particularly in view of the recent availability of esketamine nasal spray. Methods A Delphi questionnaire with 17 statements (with a 7 points Likert scale for agreement) was administered via a customized web-based platform to Italian psychiatrists with at least 5 years of experience and specific expertise in the field of depression. In the second-round physicians were asked to answer the same statements considering the interquartile range of each question as an index of their colleagues’ responses. Stata 16.1 software was used for the analyses. Results Sixty panellists, representative of the Italian territory, answered the questionnaire at the first round. For 8/17 statements more than 75% of panellists reached agreement and a high consensus as they assigned similar scores; for 4 statements the panellists assigned similar scores but in the middle of the Likert scale showing a moderate agreement with the statement, while for 5 statements there was indecision in the agreement and low consensus with the statement. Conclusions This Delphi Panel showed that there is a wide heterogeneity in Italy in the management of TRD patients, and a compelling need of standardised strategies and treatments specifically approved for TRD. A high level of consensus and agreement was obtained about the importance of adding lithium and/or antipsychotics as augmentation therapies and in the meantime about the need for long-term maintenance therapy. A high level of consensus and agreement was equally reached for the identification of esketamine nasal spray as the best option for TRD patients and for the possibility to administrate without difficulties esketamine in a community outpatient setting, highlighting the benefit of an appropriate educational support for patients.