Comparison of average time-to-relapse following ECT versus ketamine - A systematic review.
Minna Chang, Allan H Young, Mario F Juruena
Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) April 16, 2026 DOI: 10.1177/02698811261430502 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractBoth electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and ketamine show sustained therapeutic potential for treatment-resistant depression, with ECT possibly associated with longer remission. Higher doses, more frequent administration, and maintenance ECT or ketamine appear to prolong remission, and continuing oral antidepressants may extend it further. This systematic review of 13 studies found no direct head-to-head comparisons of time-to-relapse between the two treatments that met inclusion criteria, preventing formal statistical analysis. The review excluded studies involving psychotic depression, limiting generalizability to those populations.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 13 |
| Population | TRD patients |
| Topics | Depression Ketamine |
| Keywords | Antidepressant duration Electroconvulsive therapy Relapse-free time |
| Key finding | There is evidence for sustained therapeutic potential of both ECT and ketamine in treatment-resistant depression, with ECT possibly associated with longer remission, but no direct comparisons of time-to-relapse between the two treatments were available within the inclusion criteria. |
Abstract
Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses have reported impressive antidepressant effects of ketamine in treatment-resistant depression (TRD). While ketamine has been compared with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), the gold standard treatment, the extent and durability of its antidepressant effects over longer periods remain unclear. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review comparing average time-to-relapse between ECT and ketamine in TRD. To compare the average time-to-relapse between ECT and ketamine for TRD. We conducted this systematic review using PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Ovid, PsycNET, Embase and Google Scholar, against predetermined criteria. CRD42025643824. Thirteen studies met inclusion criteria: 10 examined ketamine/(s)ketamine, and 3 focused on ECT. Twelve were randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and one was retrospective. Heterogeneity was observed in dosing regimens and administration schedules, with some studies having limited follow-up and small sample sizes. Findings are synthesised narratively. In summary, there is evidence for sustained therapeutic potential of both ECT and ketamine, ECT possibly being associated with longer remission. Increased dose, frequency and use of maintenance ECT/ketamine appear to prolong remission, and continuing oral antidepressants may prolong this further. It should also be noted that this review excluded studies involving psychotic depression, leading to the exclusion of some head-to-head studies, thus limiting the generalisability of the findings in these populations. There is currently a lack of studies within our inclusion criteria that directly compare time-to-relapse after ECT and ketamine, preventing formal statistical analysis. More high-quality, large-scale RCTs directly comparing these treatment modalities with longer follow-up times are needed.