Double bookkeeping and schizophrenia spectrum: divided unified phenomenal consciousness.
Josef Parnas, Annick Urfer-Parnas, Helene Stephensen
European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience December 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-020-01185-0 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPeople with schizophrenia can live in two separate worlds at once: the shared social world and a private delusional world. Eugen Bleuler called this "double bookkeeping" but never explained it. This article shows that double bookkeeping appears across many psychotic symptoms and can be observed before psychosis starts and in schizotypal disorder. The authors propose that double bookkeeping arises from instability in how the self feels itself from within, a process called auto-affection. They discuss four implications for diagnosis, understanding, treatment, and research into causes.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Auto-affection Consciousness Double bookkeeping Schizophrenia spectrum Self-disorders |
| Citations | 59 |
| Key finding | Double bookkeeping in schizophrenia reflects an instability in the affective articulation of selfhood (auto-affection). |
Abstract
Eugen Bleuler, the founder of the concept of schizophrenia, pointed out that psychotic patients were able to live in two disjoint worlds (namely, the social, intersubjective world and the delusional world). He termed this phenomenon "double bookkeeping," but did not provide any conceptual elaboration of this phenomenon or its possible mechanisms. Double bookkeeping has been neglected in mainstream psychiatry, but it has been addressed in recent theoretical work, however mainly concerned with the issue of delusion. In this article, we present clinical material that supports the view that double bookkeeping manifests itself across various psychotic phenomena and its antecedent may be observed in premorbid (pre-onset) phases as well as in the schizotypal disorder. We try to conceptualize double bookkeeping to concretize an often atmospheric perception of paradoxicality in the encounter with the patient. A phenomenological analysis of double bookkeeping suggests an instability in the affective ("auto-affection") articulation of selfhood. We point to four main implications of our presentation: (1) diagnostic, (2) epistemological, (3) therapeutic and (4) pathogenetic research.