Skip to content

William James: The Mystical Experimentation of a Sick Soul

David H. Nikkel

Religions August 28, 2024 DOI: 10.3390/rel15080961 via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

William James's polar categories of healthy-minded, once-born religion versus the sick soul who must become twice-born for religious peace do not fit James himself, according to biographers. This paper argues instead that James's life best fits the sick-soul pattern: he was a sick soul searching for and ultimately finding twice-born religion through mystical experiences. James theorized mystical experiences as connecting with divine realities in naturalistic ways compatible with the science of his time. Today, scientific knowledge makes direct divine input harder to evidence, but James's pragmatic criterion for truth—beneficial or adaptive effects—still offers value in religious experiences.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mystical experience
Keywords Compounding of consciousnesses Healthy-minded religion Monism The sick soul
Key finding William James's life is best understood as a sick soul who found twice-born religion through mystical experiences.

Abstract

Especially in The Varieties of Religious Experience, William James developed the polar categories of healthy-minded individuals content with their once-born religion versus sick souls who need to become twice-born in order to find religious peace. Biographers of James have concluded that he does not fit well under either of his polar categories. Drawing on both data about James’ life and on his philosophical and theological writings, I demur from the biographers’ conclusion and instead advance the thesis that the overall pattern of William James’ life is best understood as a sick soul searching for—and ultimately finding—twice-born religion in connection with mystical experiences. Notably, James attempted to theorize about mystical experiences as connecting with divine reality/ies in naturalistic ways compatible with scientific knowledge of his time. Scientific knowledge today makes it more difficult to find evidence of direct divine input in religious experiences, yet one might find value in religious experiences in terms of James’ pragmatic criterion for truth: their beneficial or adaptive effects.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment