Skip to content

Hallucinogen-Psychosis Associations Are Confounded by Baseline Psychiatric History.

Jacob T Steinle, Suraj Shankar, Joshua S Siegel, Leopoldo J Cabassa, Danielle R Adams, Patricia Cavazos-Rehg, Arpana Agrawal, Ginger E Nicol, Richard Grucza, Kevin Y Xu

The Journal of clinical psychiatry June 10, 2026 DOI: 10.4088/jcp.25m16034 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

After adjusting for preexisting psychiatric conditions, the link between hallucinogen use and psychosis disappears. Among 273,466 people with substance-related hospital admissions, psychosis diagnoses were more common after hallucinogen-related admissions (16.4%) than after other substance admissions (6.6%). However, once clinical characteristics were accounted for, the increased risk became nonsignificant (hazard ratio 0.97). This suggests that observed associations between hallucinogens and psychosis are largely due to underlying mental health vulnerabilities, not a direct causal effect. The findings inform psychedelic policy by indicating that population-level data on hallucinogen safety may reflect preexisting risk factors.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Retrospective cohort study Peer reviewed
Sample size 273,466
Population Individuals with substance-related emergency admissions or hospitalizations from MarketScan Medicaid and commercial claims databases (2015-2019)
Duration 30 days to 6 months postindex event
Key finding After adjusting for clinical characteristics, hallucinogen-related admissions were not associated with increased psychosis risk (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95-1.00), indicating that the apparent association is attributable to baseline psychiatric comorbidities.

Abstract

Background: Current drug policy debates often center on whether hallucinogen-related hospital admissions indicate a causal relationship with psychosis. This study examines the extent to which observed associations between hallucinogen use and psychosis are mediated by preexisting psychiatric conditions, providing important evidence for psychedelic policy formulation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using MarketScan Medicaid and commercial claims databases from 2015-2019. The population-based sample included individuals receiving substance use disorder treatment with documented substance-related emergency admissions or hospitalizations. We compared psychosis-related admissions occurring 30 days to 6 months postindex event between individuals with hallucinogen-related admissions versus those with nonhallucinogen substance-related admissions. Cox regression models adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics to determine whether prior psychiatric history explained observed associations. Results: Among 273,466 individuals with substance-related admissions, psychosis diagnoses were more prevalent following hallucinogen-related admissions (16.4%) compared to nonhallucinogen substance admissions (6.6%, P<.001). While unadjusted models showed increased psychosis risk for hallucinogen-related admissions (hazard ratio [HR]=1.22, 95% CI=1.19-1.25), this association became nonsignificant after adjusting for clinical characteristics (HR=0.97, 95% CI=0.95-1.00). Conclusions: Apparent associations between hallucinogen use and psychosis appear largely attributable to baseline psychiatric comorbidities rather than direct causal effects. These findings carry implications for evidence-based policy development, suggesting that observed epidemiologic associations may reflect underlying vulnerability factors rather than hallucinogen-induced psychosis. Policymakers should consider these results when interpreting population-level data regarding hallucinogen safety profiles and regulatory frameworks.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment