Skip to content

Shamanism: An Inquiry into the History of the Scholarly Use of the Term in English‐Speaking North America

Peter N. Jones

Anthropology of Consciousness September 1, 2006 DOI: 10.1525/ac.2006.17.2.4

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A large-scale archival and database project examined the history of how scholars in English-speaking North America have used the terms shamanism and shaman. Two main findings emerged: current uses of these terms are inadequate for historical discussion, and the terms have been used for over a century by researchers and lay people, with their meanings shifting greatly over time. This change complicates any agreed-upon operational definition. The author concludes that current understandings are unduly limited by historical research orientations and calls for a more concise, workable definition of shamanism.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Historical analysis Peer reviewed
Citations 27
Key finding Current uses of the terms shamanism and shaman are inadequate for historical discussion, and their meanings have changed greatly over more than a century of use in English-speaking North America, complicating any agreed-upon operational definition.

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the results of a large‐scale archival and data base research project that investigated the history of the scholarly use of the terms shamanism and shaman in English‐speaking North America. This was done to provide a historical grounding in the hope of arriving at an operationally sound definition of the term. Twomajor findings emerged from the data: first, current uses of the terms shamanism and shaman are inadequate for any discussion of the phenomenon from a historical perspective; second, the terms shamanism and shaman have been widely used in English‐speaking North America by researchers, scholars, scientists, and lay people for more than a 100 years, and the use of the term has changed greatly in this time, complicating any possibility of arriving at an agreed‐upon operational definition. I discuss these two research findings and how they fit into contemporary uses of the terms, concluding that current definitions and understandings of this phenomenon are unduly circumscribed, largely the result of historical research orientations. I then suggest future research questions and call for a concise, workable understanding of the phenomenon of shamanism.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment