Demystifying hypnosis: Unravelling facts, exploring the historical roots of myths, and discerning what is hypnosis.

Hypnosis, a mind-body treatment with ancient roots, has shown effectiveness for distress, pain, and psychosomatic disorders, yet myths and misconceptions among the public and clinicians hinder its acceptance. This narrative review traces the history of those myths alongside hypnosis's evolution as a treatment, compares it to similar interventions, and presents evidence to demystify it. It distinguishes hypnotic from non-hypnotic procedures to clarify understanding, aiming to promote hypnosis in clinical and research settings. The review also highlights knowledge gaps needing further investigation to support evidence-based practice and optimize multimodal therapies that include hypnosis.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Hypnosis, a mind-body treatment dating back to early human history, has regained attention in the last decade, with research suggesting its effectiveness for varied physiological and psychological ailments such as distress, pain, and psychosomatic disorders. However, myths and misconceptions have prevailed among the general public and clinicians, hindering the adoption and acceptance of hypnosis. It is important to distinguish myths from facts and discern what is hypnosis and what is not to enhance the understanding, acceptance, and adoption of hypnotic interventions. This narrative review traces the history of myths surrounding hypnosis in contrast to the evolution of hypnosis as a treatment modality. In addition to comparing hypnosis to other interventions with similar procedures and features, the review unravels misconceptions that have impeded the adoption and acceptance of hypnosis in clinical and research settings and presents evidence to demystify this intervention. This review examines the roots of myths while presenting historical facts and evidence that support hypnosis as a treatment modality and alleviate misconceptions depicting it as mystical. Further, the review distinguishes hypnotic and non-hypnotic interventions with overlapping procedures and phenomenological features to enhance our understanding of hypnotic techniques and phenomena. This review enhances the understanding of hypnosis in historical, clinical, and research contexts by disproving related myths and misconceptions to promote the adoption of hypnosis in clinical and research contexts. Further, this review highlights knowledge gaps requiring further investigations to steer research toward an evidence-based practice of hypnosis and optimise multimodal therapies embedding hypnosis.