Drug Use during Incarceration: A Comprehensive Quality and Prevalence Study in Three Danish Prisons.
Torbjørn Lien Kjær, Peter Hindersson, Jacob Rong Bentzen, Hanne Høegh Rasmussen, Torben Breindahl
Substance use & misuse January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2421813 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA quality-control study of drug testing in three Danish prisons found that on-site immunoassay screening performed acceptably for the substances it targeted, with sensitivity ranging from 66 to 100%, specificity above 98%, and accuracy above 95%. However, laboratory analysis using LC-MS/MS and GC-MS detected additional drugs not covered by the screening, including tramadol, oxycodone, buprenorphine, ketamine, MDMA, 4-fluoroamphetamine, and GHB. The prevalence of drug use among inmates was, in order: cannabis, ethanol, cocaine, benzodiazepines, and amphetamine. No evidence emerged of a trend toward new psychoactive substances (NPS). The findings prompted plans to implement a broader screening method to reduce false negatives.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Quality control study Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 1,952 |
| Population | Inmates from three Danish prisons |
| Duration | Two-year period |
| Keywords | Drug diversion Drug screening Drug use New psychoactive substances Quality control study |
| Citations | 2 |
| Key finding | On-site immunoassay screening showed acceptable performance for targeted drugs but missed several significant substances, and no trend of NPS use was observed. |
Abstract
Drug use in Danish prisons has previously not been investigated in detail using confirmatory, laboratory analysis. The objective of the present quality study, initiated by the Danish Prison and Probation Service, was to i) evaluate the performance of an initial, on-site drug screening strategy; ii) gain insights into emerging drug trends; and iii) suggest evidence-based strategies for future drug testing. Over a two-year period, routine urine samples (n = 1952 from 710 inmates) from three Danish prisons were subjected to comprehensive drug testing. Immunoassay screening was conducted on-site. A parallel sample aliquot was forwarded to laboratory analysis by confirmatory methods: High-performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and gas chromatography and mass spectrometry (GC-MS) targeting 56 drugs-of-abuse/medical drugs, 26 key metabolites, 41 new psychoactive substances (NPS), including specific biomarkers for heroin, crack cocaine, or ethanol (a total of 123 target analytes/sample). The on-site immunoassay method showed a sensitivity from 66 to 100%; specificity was above 98%; accuracy was above 95%. Laboratory analysis detected compounds not screened for including tramadol, oxycodone, buprenorphine, ketamine, MDMA, 4-fluoroamphetamine, and GHB. The prevalence of drug use was in the order: cannabis > ethanol > cocaine > benzodiazepines > amphetamine. The performance of the immunoassay was found acceptable; however, the screening program was inadequate for detecting other significant substances. Based on these findings, a broader screening method will be implemented in future at Danish Prisons to minimize false negative results. The data did not indicate a trend of using NPS in Danish prisons.