Skip to content

Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing: A commentary on Manzotti's, "The boundaries and location of consciousness as identity theories deem fit".

Tomáš Marvan, Michal Polák

Front Psychol November 15, 2022 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1058325 via PubMed Central

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This commentary critiques neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing, responding to Manzotti's arguments about the boundaries and location of consciousness. It examines how identity theories define consciousness, questioning their assumptions and implications. The author argues that neurocentrist approaches, which equate consciousness with brain processes, face conceptual difficulties when accounting for the phenomenal character of experience. The commentary suggests that alternative frameworks may better address the relationship between neural activity and conscious experience.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key finding Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing face conceptual difficulties in accounting for the phenomenal character of conscious experience.

Abstract

Neurocentrist identity theory and neuro-phenomenal typing: A commentary on Manzotti's, "The boundaries and location of consciousness as identity theories deem fit".

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment