Skip to content

Real-world evidence of the collective effects of psychedelic therapy: Evaluating from the grassroots

Tehseen Noorani, R. Liebert

Journal of Psychedelic Studies May 27, 2024 DOI: 10.1556/2054.2024.00369 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

As psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) faces criticism of its trial evidence and moves toward legalization in some places, this paper proposes evaluating PAT not only through individual-level data but also through its collective, societal effects. Drawing on the transformative paradigm of evaluation, which prioritizes social justice and marginalized expertise, the authors outline a 'grassroots' approach. They offer eight examples of social issues linked to PAT and psychedelic use, suggesting relevant expertise and evaluation questions for each. The approach is guided by three values: rhizomatic accountability, dark reflexivity, and more-than-human hosting, which align with the contemporary practice of PAT. The aim is to spur discussion and action toward study designs that capture psychedelics' transformative potential in medicalized societies.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Randomized Peer reviewed
Keywords Psychology
Citations 2
Key finding The paper argues that evaluating psychedelic-assisted therapy should include collective, societal effects through a grassroots, transformative paradigm, guided by values of rhizomatic accountability, dark reflexivity, and more-than-human hosting.

Abstract

With a surge in critiques levelled against the evidence generated by randomised controlled trials in the study of psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), and the legalization of PAT in select jurisdictions such as Australia, and Oregon and Colorado in the United States, we consider what form the real-world evidence of its effects could take. Specifically, we propose to complement individual-level data-gathering (the usual remit of pharmacovigilance procedures) with evidence of PAT's collective effects. Taking our cue from long-standing claims that psychedelics are agents of social transformation, we draw upon the ‘transformative paradigm’ of evaluation, an approach that is itself oriented around social justice and change vis-à-vis marginalised expertise – or what we approach as ‘the grassroots’. To illustrate the potential of such grassroots evaluations, we offer eight examples of social issues that have been discussed in relation to PAT and psychedelics use and, for each, discuss the kinds of expertise that could be brought into the evaluation team and the kinds of questions that could be asked. We further describe our grassroots approach according to three values inspired by the qualities of grass roots themselves: rhizomatic accountability, dark reflexivity, and more-than-human hosting. We argue that these values align with the contemporary experience, practice, and context of PAT. We hope to generate discussion, innovation, and – ultimately – action toward specific study designs that are adequate to the task of documenting, and working with, the transformative potential of psychedelics in contemporary medicalized societies.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment