Psychedelics, embodiment, and intersubjectivity

Race is a significant factor in psychedelic experiences for racially marginalized populations, yet many studies ignore social categories like race. Drawing on critical phenomenology, anthropology, and psychedelic studies, this article argues that consciousness is fundamentally intersubjective, even during psychedelic-induced experiences. Intersubjectivity enables meaning and socialization, processes enacted through social categories. Therefore, research on psychedelic experiences must account for how social categories shape embodied experiences and their effects. This approach foregrounds identity, power, and context in clinical and naturalistic research.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Research into the social aspects of set and setting have demonstrated that race is a significant factor in psychedelic experiences for racially marginalized populations. Yet, many studies of psychedelic-induced experiences continue to proceed without collecting data on or considering the influence of race or other social categories. These approaches abstract subjectivity from its embodied and historical conditions, isolating consciousness in ways that do not accord with lived experience.This article draws on critical phenomenology, anthropology, and treatments of race in the field of psychedelic studies to outline how social categories mediate subjective experience in historically specific ways through the framework of embodiment.I argue that consciousness is fundamentally intersubjective, including during psychedelic-induced experiences. Intersubjectivity is an existential condition that makes possible meaning, communication, and socialization, processes which rely on and are perpetually (re)enacted through social categories. Therefore, studies of psychedelic-induced experiences must account for the foundational role that social categories play in constituting such embodied experiences and their effects.This approach makes embodied differences matter to the study of psychedelic-induced experiences, opening new avenues of inquiry that foreground identity, power, and context in both clinical and naturalistic research.