Peircean cosmogony's symbolic agapistic self-organization as an example of the influence of eastern philosophy on western thinking.

Charles S. Peirce's process philosophy proposes a non-theistic, agapistic evolution from nothingness, drawing on Eastern traditions like Advaita Vedanta and Buddhism, as well as American transcendentalists. This triadic semiotic process theory is argued to better accommodate the quantum field view and the emergence of consciousness than mechanistic or information-based approaches. Peirce sees the universe as a reasoning process evolving from pure potentiality to a fully ordered Summon Bonum. The paper compares this with John Archibald Wheeler's "It from bit" cosmogony, which leads to an info-computational view lacking a phenomenological foundation. David Chalmers' double-aspect interpretation attempts to add phenomenology but fails to integrate meaning and rationality. Alex Hankey's work addresses Husserl's criteria for consciousness but cannot explain the connection between core consciousness and the physical world.

Study at a glance

Abstract

Charles S. Peirce developed a process philosophy featuring a non-theistic agapistic evolution from nothingness. It is an Eastern inspired alternative to the Western mechanical ontology of classical science also inspired by the American transcendentalists. Advaitism and Buddhism are the two most important Eastern philosophical traditions that encompass scientific knowledge and the idea of spontaneous evolutionary development. This article attempts to show how Peirce's non-mechanistic triadic semiotic process theory is suited better to embrace the quantum field view than mechanistic and information-based views are with regard to a theory of the emergence of consciousness. Peirce views the universe as a reasoning process developing from pure potentiality to the fully ordered rational Summon Bonum. The paper compares this with John Archibald Wheeler's "It from bit" cosmogony based on quantum information science, which leads to the info-computational view of nature, mind and culture. However, this theory lacks a phenomenological foundation. David Chalmers' double aspect interpretation of information attempts to overcome the limitations of the info-computational view. Chalmers supplements Batesonian and Wheelerian info-computationalism - both of which lack a phenomenological aspect - with a dimension that corresponds to the phenomenological aspect of reality. However, he does not manage to produce an integrated theory of the development of meaning and rationality. Alex Hankey's further work goes some way towards establishing a theory that can satisfy Husserl's criteria for consciousness - such as a sense of being and time - but Hankey's dependence on Chalmers' theory is still not able to account for what the connection between core consciousness and the physical world is.