Ketamine and the Consequences of Positive Psychedelic Exceptionalism
Zachary J Verne, Natalie Gukasyan, Jeffrey S Zabinski
American Journal of Bioethics January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2433424 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractPsychedelics raise ethical concerns similar to those in other areas of medicine and psychology, not unique ones. The authors argue that treating psychedelics as ethically exceptional distorts risk assessment and policy. They identify several shared ethical considerations—such as informed consent, vulnerability, and adverse effects—that apply to psychedelic therapy just as they do to other treatments. The paper concludes that psychedelics should be integrated into existing medical and ethical frameworks rather than governed by special rules.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Medicine Psychology |
| Citations | 2 |
| Key finding | Psychedelics share ethical considerations with other medical and psychological interventions and should not be treated as ethically exceptional. |
Abstract
In “Distinctive but not Exceptional: The Risks of Psychedelic Ethical Exceptionalism,” Cheung et al. (2025) elaborate the ways that psychedelics share individual ethical considerations with those o...