Equipoise and Personal Experience: Maintaining Objectivity in Psychedelic Research
Katrina Debonis, Walter Dunn, Thomas B. Strouse
American Journal of Bioethics January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2433446 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe resurgence of psychedelic research raises ethical questions about whether facilitators should have personal psychedelic experience. Some argue that such experience is essential for effective and ethical facilitation, while others contend that it is unnecessary and may introduce bias. The authors examine these competing perspectives, weighing arguments about empathy, trust, and professional competence. They conclude that requiring personal experience could undermine scientific objectivity and equitable access to therapy, but also acknowledge that experiential knowledge may enhance therapeutic rapport. The paper calls for clearer ethical guidelines that balance these concerns without mandating personal use.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Medicine Psychology Philosophy |
| Key finding | The authors argue that requiring personal psychedelic experience for facilitators raises ethical concerns about objectivity and access, though experiential knowledge may enhance therapeutic rapport. |
Abstract
The resurgence of psychedelic research has brought with it unique ethical considerations, including the role of personal psychedelic experience among facilitators. Some have argued that personal ps...