Skip to content

Equipoise and Personal Experience: Maintaining Objectivity in Psychedelic Research

Katrina Debonis, Walter Dunn, Thomas B. Strouse

American Journal of Bioethics January 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2024.2433446 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The resurgence of psychedelic research raises ethical questions about whether facilitators should have personal psychedelic experience. Some argue that such experience is essential for effective and ethical facilitation, while others contend that it is unnecessary and may introduce bias. The authors examine these competing perspectives, weighing arguments about empathy, trust, and professional competence. They conclude that requiring personal experience could undermine scientific objectivity and equitable access to therapy, but also acknowledge that experiential knowledge may enhance therapeutic rapport. The paper calls for clearer ethical guidelines that balance these concerns without mandating personal use.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Medicine Psychology Philosophy
Key finding The authors argue that requiring personal psychedelic experience for facilitators raises ethical concerns about objectivity and access, though experiential knowledge may enhance therapeutic rapport.

Abstract

The resurgence of psychedelic research has brought with it unique ethical considerations, including the role of personal psychedelic experience among facilitators. Some have argued that personal ps...

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment