Skip to content

Art and Influence, Presence and Navigation in Southern African Forager Landscapes

Sam Challis, Andrew S. Skinner

Religions December 13, 2021 DOI: 10.3390/rel12121099 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The New Animisms and the ontological turn, active since the mid-2000s, offer valuable insights for interpreting rock art by showing that in animist societies, distinctions between nature and culture, religious belief and practicality, and the sacred and profane are minimal. A key problem is that the perspectives of such societies diverge more fundamentally from Western views than often acknowledged. Archaeologists of religion must become anthropologists of the wider world to recognize animistic and shamanistic ontologies and to question where Cartesian separations of nature/culture, religious/mundane, and human/animal obscure other ways of being. This work locates southern African shamanic rock art within broader animist shamanisms.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Dichotomy Perspective graphical Interpretation philosophy Epistemology Environmental ethics
Citations 14
Key finding Animist societies' perspectives diverge more fundamentally from Western dichotomies than often accounted for, requiring archaeologists to become anthropologists to properly interpret rock art.

Abstract

With earlier origins and a rebirth in the late 1990s, the New Animisms and the precipitate ‘ontological turn’ have now been in full swing since the mid-2000s. They make a valuable contribution to the interpretation of the rock arts of numerous societies, particularly in their finding that in animist societies, there is little distinction between nature and culture, religious belief and practicality, the sacred and the profane. In the process, a problem of perspective arises: the perspectives of such societies, and the analogical sources that illuminate them, diverge in more foundational terms from Western perspectives than is often accounted for. This is why archaeologists of religion need to be anthropologists of the wider world, to recognise where animistic and shamanistic ontologies are represented, and perhaps where there is reason to look closely at how religious systems are used to imply Cartesian separations of nature and culture, religious and mundane, human/person and animal/non-person, and where these dichotomies may obscure other forms of being-in-the-world. Inspired by Bird-David, Descola, Hallowell, Ingold, Vieiros de Castro, and Willerslev, and acting through the lens of navigation in a populated, enculturated, and multinatural world, this contribution locates southern African shamanic expressions of rock art within broader contexts of shamanisms that are animist.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment