Skip to content

How Enaction and Ecological Approaches Can Contribute to Sports and Skill Learning.

Carlos Avilés, José A Navia, Luis-Miguel Ruiz-Pérez, Jorge A Zapatero-Ayuso

Frontiers in psychology January 1, 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.523691 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Learning in sports and physical education can be understood through enactive and ecological psychology. The enactive perspective emphasizes sense-making and sensorimotor schemes, while natural learning environments support human development. Research methods like neurophenomenology and self-confrontation interviews reveal the meanings, sensations, and emotions performers experience. The ecological approach focuses on attunement, calibration, education of intention, and representative experimental designs. The paper compares both approaches and advocates for a common project combining their main elements.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Acquisition Embodied cognition Expertise Mastery Physical education
Citations 10
Key finding The paper argues for integrating enactive and ecological psychology to explain learning in sports and physical education.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explain learning in sports and physical education (PE) from the perspective of enactive and ecological psychology. The learning process is first presented from the enactive perspective, and some relevant notions such as sense-making and sensorimotor schemes are developed. Then, natural learning environments are described, and their importance in the human development process is explained. This is followed by a section devoted to the learner's experience in which some research methods are explained, such as neurophenomenology, in addition to self-confrontation, interviews aimed at bringing out the meaning, sensations, and emotions that performers experience when they are immersed in their sport or a PE class. The sections on the ecological approach deal with the attunement, calibration, the education of intention, and the importance of representative experimental designs. The last section addresses the main similarities and differences between the two approaches. Finally, we state our theoretical position in favor of a common project that brings together the main elements of both post-cognitive approaches.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment