PHENOMENOLOGY AND SYMBOL: FROM HUSSERL TO BACHELARD
HORIZON / Fenomenologicheskie issledovanija/ STUDIEN ZUR PHÄNOMENOLOGIE / STUDIES IN PHENOMENOLOGY / ÉTUDES PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIQUES January 1, 2020 DOI: 10.21638/2226-5260-2020-9-1-235-255 via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractHusserl's phenomenological approach is inherently blind to the role of symbols, yet both the objects of experience (noema) and the acts of consciousness (noesis) are always already shaped by symbolism. This means the project of pure phenomenological description requires a "symbolic correction." The experienced object is always symbolically constituted, and the ego's position is not only culturally infected but also serves as an "assemblage point" where phenomena form as constellations. Moreover, the flow of phenomena follows culturally specific scenarios rather than a universal temporal model. The author examines how philosopher Gaston Bachelard's poetic topology of the Home offers one such corrective.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Phenomenology philosophy Symbol formal Psychoanalysis Literature Epistemology |
| Citations | 1 |
| Key finding | Husserl's phenomenology is blind to the symbolic constitution of experience, requiring a "symbolic correction" such as that offered by Bachelard's poetic topology of the Home. |
Abstract
“Blindness” to the problem of the symbol necessarily follows from the main positions of the research \nstrategy of Husserl phenomenology. However, both noema and noesis, as well as the flow of cogitations \nin our minds are initially infected with symbolism, and therefore the project of phenomenological \ndescription needs a “symbolic correction.” The supposed and experienced object is supposed as a symbolically \nfilled object, and the position of the ego describing, constituting, experiencing its object is \nnot only initially infected with cultural symbolism, but also represents the “assemblage point” of any \nphenomenon as a “constellation” formation. Symbolism is initially “embedded” in any phenomenon \nand in any scheme of “pure” consciousness. Correspondingly, the flow of phenomena that can be subjected \nto both noematic and noetic description proceeds according to various “scenarios,” “schemes,” \nwhich are nationally and culturally based, and do not follow the single universal route (Past, Present, \nFuture), which is peculiar only to the new European model of time. This drawback of Husserl’s project \nwas overcome in varying degrees by some phenomenologically oriented philosophers. The author of \nthe article analyzes one of such “symbolic adjustments” by reference to the poetic topology (microphenomenology) \nof poetic image of the Home in the text of French philosopher G. Bachelard.