Matthew Oram. The Trials of Psychedelic Therapy: LSD Psychotherapy in America.
American Historical Review June 1, 2020 DOI: 10.1093/ahr/rhaa270 via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractLSD research did not end abruptly with the 1965 Drug Abuse Control Amendments but continued into the mid-1970s, a gradual decline Matthew Oram describes as a 'quiet death' from bureaucratic cuts. Funders and regulators demanded randomized clinical trials—a design suited to nonpsychiatric drugs—for psychedelic therapy, which inherently involves hard-to-control personal and contextual factors and lacks a feasible placebo. Drawing on new primary sources, Oram argues that understanding this drawn-out decline is essential to current debates about psychedelic therapy's revival and examines how researchers struggled for legitimacy during a scientific paradigm shift and cultural crisis.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Historical analysis Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Psychology History |
| Citations | 2 |
| Key finding | LSD psychotherapy research continued into the mid-1970s, ending not abruptly but through a gradual 'quiet death' driven by bureaucratic demands for randomized clinical trial standards incompatible with psychedelic therapy. |
Abstract
According to most histories, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) is a pharmaceutical whose therapeutic potential was dashed by controversies concerning countercultural drug use and covert government research. In contrast to familiar accounts of a rapid government crackdown on the drug, Matthew Oram’s The Trials of Psychedelic Therapy: LSD Psychotherapy in America describes the conclusion of scientific research on psychedelics as a “quiet death” of gradual bureaucratic cuts (183). Psychedelic therapy is a treatment that, by definition, involves personal and contextual factors that cannot be easily controlled, and devising a placebo for a psychedelic experience is inherently difficult. Yet for over a decade funders and regulators rationalized cuts to psychedelic research by demanding that studies conform to the standard of the randomized clinical trial—a design that rose to prominence in the mid-twentieth century with the investigation of nonpsychiatric pharmaceuticals such as antibiotics (100). Drawing on fresh primary source material, both published and archival, Oram demonstrates that psychedelic therapy research did not end abruptly with the restrictions placed on LSD by the Drug Abuse Control Amendments of 1965, but instead continued well into the mid-1970s. Oram argues that understanding the drawn-out decline of LSD research in the twentieth century is essential to contemporary debates about psychedelic therapy’s revival. In addition to being relevant to recent discussions regarding LSD’s therapeutic potential, The Trials of Psychedelic Therapy provides an enduring examination of the ways in which researchers struggled to maintain legitimacy throughout a scientific paradigm shift and cultural crisis.