Skip to content

The association between ketamine and esketamine with alcohol and substance misuse: Reports to the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS).

Angela T H Kwan, Joshua D Rosenblat, Rodrigo B Mansur, Kayla M Teopiz, Roger S McIntyre

Journal of affective disorders September 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.05.116 via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Ketamine and esketamine are effective for treatment-resistant depression and may help people with substance use disorder or alcohol use disorder when paired with behavioral therapy. However, concerns exist about their own abuse potential. Analyzing reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, ketamine showed significantly increased reporting odds for alcohol abuse, substance dependence, substance use disorder, substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder, and drug abuse. In contrast, esketamine showed significantly reduced reporting odds for substance abuse, drug dependence, and drug abuse. Mixed results across different substance-related outcomes suggest possible beneficial effects, but causal links cannot be established due to data limitations.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Pharmacovigilance analysis Peer reviewed
Population Adverse event reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)
Interventions Ketamine Esketamine
Topics Esketamine Ketamine
Keywords Diversion Ketamine abuse liability Treatment-resistant depression trd Adverse event reporting Substance misuse
Citations 8
Key finding Ketamine was associated with increased reporting odds for multiple substance misuse outcomes, while esketamine was associated with reduced reporting odds for substance abuse, drug dependence, and drug abuse.

Abstract

Ketamine and esketamine have been proven to be effective in treating adults with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Preliminary evidence indicates that, when combined with behavioral and psychological interventions, both agents may offer benefits for individuals with substance use disorder (SUD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD). Notwithstanding, concerns have been raised as to whether either or both agents are associated with abuse and/or gateway activity. Herein, we evaluate disproportionate reporting expressed as reporting odds ratios (ROR) for esketamine and ketamine. The outcomes of interest include alcohol problem, alcoholism, alcohol abuse, substance dependence, SUD, substance abuse, drug dependence, drug use disorder and drug abuse as codified by the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) within the FAERS. The IC025 values were significant for ketamine in cases of alcohol abuse (0.28), substance dependence (1.88), substance use disorder (0.996), substance abuse (0.61), drug dependence (0.56), drug use disorder (1.17) and drug abuse (1.22). Additionally, oxycontin showed significant IC025 values for substance dependence (0.067), substance use disorder (0.094), substance abuse (0.035), and drug dependence (0.27). We observed significant increases in the reporting odds ratios (RORs) for ketamine with respect to various outcomes: alcohol abuse (ROR 2.84, 95 % CI 1.53-5.28; p = 0.0010), substance dependence (ROR 18.72, 95 % CI 8.49-41.30; p ≤ 0.0001), SUD (ROR 11.40, 95 % CI 4.24-30.65; p ≤ 0.0001), substance abuse (ROR 2.29, 95 % CI 1.73-3.04; p ≤ 0.0001), drug dependence (ROR 1.99, 95 % CI 1.64-2.42; p ≤ 0.0001), drug use disorder (ROR 4.50, 2.94-6.88; p ≤ 0.0001) and drug abuse (ROR 3.72, 3.36-4.12; p ≤ 0.0001). For esketamine, we observed that the ROR was significantly reduced for substance abuse (ROR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.22-0.63; p = 0.0003), drug dependence (ROR 0.13, 95 % CI 0.076-0.23; p ≤ 0.0001) and drug abuse (ROR 0.048, 95 % CI 0.030-0.078; p ≤ 0.0001). To our knowledge, this is the first report of spontaneous adverse events related to these outcomes of interest in the FAERS. Mixed RORs were observed across aspects of SUD and AUD for both ketamine and esketamine. Due to limitations in the FAERS, establishing causal links between new onset alcohol and substance misuse with either agent remains inconclusive. Possible beneficial effects on measures of SUD and AUD were observed. It is currently unclear, but possible, whether both agents have differential ameliorative effects across dimensions of SUD and AUD, which is a focus of ongoing research.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment