Skip to content

Overshadowing and salience attribution in relation to cannabis use

Christopher Dawes, Samuel Joy McGreal, Shivika Marwaha, José Prados, Antoine Reheis, Alin Dumitrescu, John L. Waddington, Paula M. Moran, Colm O’Tuathaigh

Schizophrenia Research Cognition May 11, 2024 DOI: 10.1016/j.scog.2024.100315 via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Regular cannabis use is linked to abnormalities in how the brain processes salience—the mechanism that determines which stimuli stand out. In a non-clinical adult sample, current cannabis users showed reduced overshadowing (a measure of cue competition and salience processing) during a learning task compared to non-users, with medium effect sizes. Cannabis users also displayed higher implicit aberrant salience on a separate task. Schizotypy or aberrant salience inventory scores did not explain this relationship. The findings suggest that regular cannabis use is associated with altered salience processing, which may relate to the known link between cannabis and psychosis.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Cross-sectional observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 280
Population Non-clinical adults
Topics Cannabis
Keywords Salience neuroscience Attribution Relation database Cognitive psychology
Key finding Current cannabis users had significantly lower overshadowing scores and higher implicit aberrant salience compared to non-users.

Abstract

Aberrant attentional salience has been implicated in the cannabis-psychosis association. Here, history and frequency of cannabis use were examined against changes in overshadowing (OS), a cue competition paradigm that involves salience processing. Additionally, we examined the association between OS and alternative measures of aberrant salience, as well as schizotypy, in a non-clinical adult sample. 280 participants completed an online geometry learning-based OS task, while a subset (N = 149) also completed the Salience Attribution Task (SAT) measure of aberrant salience. All completed the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI), and the modified Cannabis Experience Questionnaire (CEQmv). Differences across OS and SAT performance stages and between cannabis use groups were assessed using mixed ANOVAs. Multiple regression and correlational analyses assessed the relationships between OS and SAT task metrics and SPQ and ASI subscale scores. Current cannabis users had significantly lower OS scores during the testing phase relative to those who do not use cannabis, at medium effect sizes. Schizotypy or ASI scores did not mediate this relationship. In the SAT, current cannabis users presented significantly higher implicit aberrant salience relative to non-users. Scores in the first training phase of the OS task significantly predicted higher explicit aberrant and adaptive salience scores in the SAT. These data indicate an association between regular cannabis use and abnormalities in cue competition effects in a healthy adult sample. Comparisons of OS and SAT cast new light on putative overlapping mechanisms underlying performance across different measures of salience.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment