Skip to content

Toward a universal theory of consciousness

Ryota Kanai, Ippei Fujisawa

Neuroscience of Consciousness January 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niae022 via Semantic Scholar

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The paper introduces 'Universality' as a desirable property for theories of consciousness, borrowed from physics, where fundamental laws apply consistently everywhere. Universality requires that a theory can determine whether any fully described dynamical system is conscious or non-conscious, based on intrinsic properties rather than external interpretation. Most current theories lack this property, as they focus on neural correlates of consciousness in brain-centric systems. The authors argue that functionalist theories could become universal by specifying mathematical formulations of their concepts. While neurobiological and functionalist theories remain useful, a universal theory is needed to fully explain why certain systems possess consciousness.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Medicine Philosophy
Key finding Universality, defined as the ability of a theory to determine consciousness in any dynamical system based on intrinsic properties, is proposed as an additional desirable property for theories of consciousness, which most current theories lack.

Abstract

Abstract While falsifiability has been broadly discussed as a desirable property of a theory of consciousness, in this paper, we introduce the meta-theoretic concept of “Universality” as an additional desirable property for a theory of consciousness. The concept of universality, often assumed in physics, posits that the fundamental laws of nature are consistent and apply equally everywhere in the universe and remain constant over time. This assumption is crucial in science, acting as a guiding principle for developing and testing theories. When applied to theories of consciousness, universality can be defined as the ability of a theory to determine whether any fully described dynamical system is conscious or non-conscious. Importantly, for a theory to be universal, the determinant of consciousness needs to be defined as an intrinsic property of a system as opposed to replying on the interpretation of the external observer. The importance of universality originates from the consideration that given that consciousness is a natural phenomenon, it could in principle manifest in any physical system that satisfies a certain set of conditions whether it is biological or non-biological. To date, apart from a few exceptions, most existing theories do not possess this property. Instead, they tend to make predictions as to the neural correlates of consciousness based on the interpretations of brain functions, which makes those theories only applicable to brain-centric systems. While current functionalist theories of consciousness tend to be heavily reliant on our interpretations of brain functions, we argue that functionalist theories could be converted to a universal theory by specifying mathematical formulations of the constituent concepts. While neurobiological and functionalist theories retain their utility in practice, we will eventually need a universal theory to fully explain why certain types of systems possess consciousness.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment