The association between stage of treatment-resistant depression and clinical utility of ketamine/esketamine: A systematic review.
Anastasia Levinta, Shakila Meshkat, Roger S McIntyre, Cameron Ho, Leanna M W Lui, Yena Lee, Rodrigo B Mansur, Kayla M Teopiz, Nelson B Rodrigues, Joshua D Di Vincenzo, Felicia Ceban, Joshua D Rosenblat
Journal of affective disorders December 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.050 via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractKetamine rapidly reduces depressive symptoms in people with treatment-resistant depression, but its effectiveness may diminish as the number of prior failed treatments increases. A systematic review of 18 randomized controlled trials found that ketamine and esketamine worked at both lower and higher stages of treatment resistance, yet effect sizes and duration of benefits were greater in studies involving patients with fewer prior antidepressant failures. Variability in how studies defined treatment resistance and measured outcomes prevented clear comparisons of efficacy across different resistance stages. The authors conclude that while ketamine remains broadly effective, more failed treatment trials may reduce its efficacy, and participant-level data are needed to clarify the relationship between resistance level and response.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Systematic review Randomized Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Individuals with treatment resistant depression |
| Interventions | Ketamine Esketamine |
| Topics | Esketamine Ketamine |
| Keywords | Bdnf Bipolar Glutamate Nmda |
| Key finding | Ketamine was effective in reducing depressive symptoms across all stages of treatment resistance, but effect size and duration were greater in studies with lower stages of resistance. |
Abstract
Ketamine has demonstrated rapid and significant antidepressant effects in patients with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Herein, we conducted a systematic review to determine ketamine's efficacy as a function of the stage of treatment resistance (e.g., number of failed treatments) among individuals with TRD. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus from inception to August 2021 was conducted. Where applicable, the studies were categorized into low and high stages of resistance, where low category included studies where the mean number of failed antidepressants was <3 or had a higher proportion of subjects with ≤2 antidepressant trials. Reported indicators of treatment resistance and efficacy were extracted from randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing ketamine or esketamine for TRD. In total, 18 RCTs were included in the current review. There was variability across reported indicators of disease severity, definition of treatment resistance, as well as treatment protocols, preventing clear direct and indirect comparison of relative efficacy of ketamine at different stages of treatment resistance. Ketamine was effective in reducing depressive symptoms in RCTs at both lower and higher stages of treatment resistance; however, the effect size and duration of effects was greater in RCTs of lower stage of treatment resistance. Our findings suggested that ketamine has antidepressant efficacy across all identified stages of treatment resistance, however with increasing failed treatment trials, treatment might be less efficacious. At this time, the comparative efficacy as a function of resistance stage remains to be well-established. Evaluation of participant level data is required to more clearly determine the association between level of treatment resistance and likelihood of response.