Mind-Manifesting Hypnosis: Phenomenological Similarities and Differences in Hypnotic and Psychedelic Contexts.

Hypnosis and psychedelic alterations of consciousness share many similarities, including overlapping predictors like absorption and openness to experience, and comparable experiential changes such as altered bodily sensations, imagery, and transcendent phenomena. However, psychedelic experiences typically last longer, are less controllable, more intense, and carry a greater potential for both negative outcomes and positive long-term effects. The paper argues that states of consciousness should not be defined by their preceding contexts and that hypnosis, psychedelic research, and clinical work should be more integrated than they have been recently.

Study at a glance

Abstract

In the 1970s, researchers and theoreticians of states of consciousness jointly discussed hypnosis and psychedelic alterations of consciousness, but recent research has mostly kept these topics apart. This paper discusses the similarities and differences of hypnosis and psychedelic alterations of consciousness, stressing that states of consciousness should not be defined by their preceding contexts. Predictors of positive responses to psychedelics (e.g. absorption and openness to experience) also predict hypnotic responsiveness. Most experiential changes (e.g. changes in bodily sensations and image, increased simple and complex imagery, and transcendent phenomena) produced by psychedelics are also reported within minimal suggestion hypnosis by highly responsive participants. Yet, there are differences in single sessions in that, as compared with hypnosis, psychedelic experiences typically last longer, are less controllable but more intense, and might produce more negative outcomes but also have a greater potential for positive long-term effects. Hypnosis, psychedelic research, and clinical work can enrich each other and should be more integrated than has been the case recently.