Skip to content

Farmers' Soil Fertility Management in Niger and Opportunities for Improvements Through Mechanization, Microdosing, and Seed Coating

Abdourahamane Issa M. Nourou, Addam Kiari Saidou, Jens B. Aune

Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems December 8, 2020 DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.570561 via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

In Niger, pearl millet production can be substantially improved with a low-cost package that combines mechanized sowing, seed priming, fungicide seed treatment, and fertilizer. A survey found that most farmers use manure, but few use mineral fertilizer or microdosing due to high labor demands. Field experiments over two years at three sites tested two improved packages against a control. The first package (NPK fertilizer mixed with seed) increased yield by 70.9% and net benefit by 111.8%, while the second (rock phosphate seed coating) increased yield by 42.7% and net benefit by 72.8%. Both packages reduced time to maturity by 10 days and lowered weeding costs, making production more climate-resilient.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Field experiment with survey Peer reviewed
Population Pearl millet fields in Niger
Interventions mechanized sowing seed priming seed treatment with fungicide NPK fertilizer phosphate coating
Dose 0.3 g NPK hill−1 (T1), 0.35 g rock phosphate hill−1 (T2)
Duration 2 years
Topics Microdosing
Keywords Sustainability Gross margin Planter Seed priming
Key finding Two improved production packages combining mechanized sowing, seed priming, and fertilizer increased pearl millet yield by 70.9% and 42.7% and net benefit by 111.8% and 72.8% compared to a control.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize pearl millet production in Niger and to assess the potential impact of a low-cost production package on land- and labor productivity. The survey showed that 62% of the farmers used manure, while 22% used mineral fertilizer. Of those who used mineral fertilizer only 18% practiced microdosing. High labor demand was given as the reason why 89% of the farmers did not practice microdosing. In field experiments, we tested at three sites and over 2 years a control (no fertilizer and manual sowing) against two improved production packages consisting of mechanized sowing, seed priming, seed treatment with fungicide and NPK fertilizer in treatment 1 (T1), or phosphate coating in treatment 2 (T2). In the production package T1, seed and NPK fertilizer were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and this mixture was thereafter applied by a planter giving a fertilizer rate of 0.3 g NPK hill−1. In treatment T2, the seeds were coated with rock phosphate, and were thereafter sown by a planter giving a rate of 0.35 g rock phosphate hill−1. Compared to the control, the T1 and T2 treatments increased yield by 70.9 and 42.7%, respectively. The two improved production packages reduced time to maturity by 10 days. The net benefit increased for the T1 and T2 treatments compared to the control by 111.8 and 72.8%, respectively. This increase was particularly due to the higher grain and stover yield as well as lower weeding costs. These technologies will also render pearl millet production more resistant to climate change due to timelier sowing and weeding, a better crop establishment, and a shortened growing season.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment