Phase 0 - Microdosing strategy in clinical trials
Indian Journal of Pharmacology November 1, 2008 DOI: 10.4103/0253-7613.45147 via Elsevier
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractDrug development is lengthy, complex, and costly. In 2004, the FDA's 'Critical Path' document highlighted a gap between scientific advances and the drug development process, addressing microdosing. Microdosing uses extremely low, nonpharmacologically active doses to determine a drug's pharmacokinetic profile in humans. It offers a new tool that could complement traditional animal-to-human scaling and reshape phase I clinical research. As Phase 0 methods and technology advance, human microdosing may become applicable to more drugs in development.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Microdosing, using extremely low nonpharmacologically active doses, could complement standard animal-to-human scaling and redefine phase I clinical research. |
Abstract
Drug development is an activity that is long, complex and expensive. In 2004, attrition in the drug development paradigm prompted the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to introduce its 'Critical Path' document, which highlighted the serious discordance between major scientific advances and limited drug development process. One issue addressed was that of microdosing. The concept of microdosing involves the use of extremely low, nonpharmacologically active doses of a drug to define the pharmacokinetic profile of the medication in human subjects. Microdosing, thus, appears as a new viable concept in the 'toolbox' of the drug development activity. It appears that microdosing strategy could complement standard animal-to-human scaling, redefining the existing concept of phase I clinical research. In future, when research methods and technology involved in Phase 0 studies become more sophisticated, human microdosing may be applied to a number of drugs developed subsequently.