The Duality of Divine Presence: Exploring the Dark Schechina in Jewish Mystical Thought and Post-Holocaust Theology

The paper examines the concept of the dark side of the Schechina (Divine Presence) in Jewish mystical thought and its role in post-Holocaust theology. It traces this idea from rabbinic literature through medieval Kabbalah to Hasidic texts, noting parallels with the Hindu goddess Kali. The argument shows how modern theological discourse reimagines the relationship between human suffering and divine pathos, using the darker aspects of the feminine divine to address theodicy questions raised by the Holocaust. This reconceptualization departs from traditional theodicy by acknowledging both human and divine responsibility for evil while maintaining a monotheistic worldview.

Study at a glance

Abstract

This paper examines the complex theological concept of the dark side of the Schechina (Divine Presence) as presented in contemporary Jewish mystical thought and its relationship to post-Holocaust theological discourse. Through close analysis of primary texts that explore the feminine divine in Jewish tradition from rabbinic literature through medieval Kabbalah to Hasidic texts and engaging with Christian and Jewish Post-Holocaust theological perspectives, this study investigates how modern theological discourse has reimagined the relationship between human suffering and divine pathos. The paper reveals striking parallels between traditional Jewish conceptions of the darker aspects of Schechina and cross-cultural manifestations of the divine feminine, particularly the Hindu goddess Kali, while also engaging with the theodicy questions raised by the Holocaust/Shoah. By tracing the development of Schechina consciousness from classical rabbinic literature through the writings of Rebbe Nachman of Breslov and contemporary theological responses to catastrophe, this study demonstrates how the darker aspects of the feminine divine have been employed to address theological questions raised by historical catastrophe. The paper argues that this reconceptualization of divine suffering represents a significant departure from traditional theodicy, offering a theological framework that acknowledges both human and divine responsibility for evil while maintaining a monotheistic worldview.