Portrait of a Poison: Datura in Buddhist Magic
Journal of Contemplative Studies July 23, 2025 DOI: 10.57010/gdpt2568 via DOAJ
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe psychoactive plant Datura metel appears in premodern South Asian texts, particularly in tantric Buddhist (Vajrayāna) yoginī tantras, where it is used in instructions for magical acts (ṣaṭkarman). The plant's material potency as a dangerous poison, well established in Sanskrit medical literature, gave it a magical potency that made it a favored ingredient in hostile magic rites (abhicāra). The paper argues that the line between material and magical is an inappropriate distinction when examining these tantras, and that the most responsible approach to psychotropic plants in premodern cultures is to examine what actors from that culture said about the plant rather than relying on modern knowledge of its effects.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Population | Premodern South Asian texts on Datura metel |
| Topics | Buddhism |
| Keywords | Tantra Ethnobotany Magic India |
| Key finding | Datura metel's status as a dangerous poison in Sanskrit medical literature gave it magical potency, making it a favored ingredient in hostile magic rites in yoginī tantras. |
Abstract
The psychoactive plant Datura metel appears across a range of traditions in premodern South Asia preserved in texts. Among those traditions is the form of tantric Buddhism (Vajrayāna) located in the yoginī tantras. In Vajrayāna works, the plant is most prominently used in instructions for bringing about one or more of the magical acts (ṣaṭkarman). This paper explores the possibility that datura was consumed for its hallucination-inducing potential by considering how the plant was viewed and used in premodern South Asia through an ethnobotanical approach to relevant texts. I argue that the material potency of the plant as a dangerous poison, well established in Sanskrit medical literature from an early period, gave it a magical potency that made it a favored ingredient in several hostile magic rites (abhicāra) found in the yoginī tantras. I suggest that the line between material and magical is an inappropriate distinction to draw when examining these tantras, and that the most responsible way to approach the use of psychotropic plants in a premodern culture is by examining what actors from that culture said about the plant rather than relying on our existing knowledge of the effect of that plant.